“…In Figure 3a, the oxidation peak of Co‐MOF/NF at 1.25 V is attributed to the change of Co 2+ into Co 3+[35] and the peak of bare NF at 1.48 V is ascribed to the change of Ni 2+ into Ni 3+ [36] . It is worthwhile mentioning that Co‐MOF/NF is superior to most reported Co‐based MOF catalysts in alkaline condition (Table S1), such as Co‐MOF [37] (η10 mA cm −2 =302 mV), Co‐BTC‐5 wt % rGO [38] (η10 mA cm −2 =290 mV), UTSA‐16 [39] (η10 mA cm −2 =408 mV), Co‐MONs [40] (η10 mA cm −2 =309 mV), etc. Figure 3b displays the Tafel slopes for Co‐MOF/ NF, RuO 2 /NF, Co‐MOF powder/NF and bare NF, where it can be seen that the Co‐MOF/NF has a smaller Tafel slope of 74 mV dec −1 than that of Co‐MOF powder/NF (109 mV dec −1 ) and even the commercial RuO 2 grown on NF (75 mV dec −1 ), suggesting Co‐MOF/NF owns more favorable catalytic kinetics.…”