A Companion to Rock Art 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9781118253892.ch34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Suspect Terrain: Dating Rock Engravings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We chose the southern Owens Valley and the adjacent Rose Valley, both parts of the Mojave Desert in southern California, as an initial test site because of its prominent role in the scientific study of rock varnish [e.g., 2 , 19 ], the existence of radiometrically dated rock surfaces [e.g., 19 , 28 , 48 50 ], and the presence of well-documented rock art [e.g., 24 , 51 ], including a large corpus of dated petroglyphs in this and nearby regions [ 36 , and references therein, 52 ]. The rock art in this area has been the subject of vigorous–and sometimes acerbic–debate over decades, both with regards to its meaning and function [e.g., 24 , 51 , 53 – 59 ] and its time of creation [e.g., 24 , 28 , 36 , 52 , 54 , 55 , 60 , 61 63 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose the southern Owens Valley and the adjacent Rose Valley, both parts of the Mojave Desert in southern California, as an initial test site because of its prominent role in the scientific study of rock varnish [e.g., 2 , 19 ], the existence of radiometrically dated rock surfaces [e.g., 19 , 28 , 48 50 ], and the presence of well-documented rock art [e.g., 24 , 51 ], including a large corpus of dated petroglyphs in this and nearby regions [ 36 , and references therein, 52 ]. The rock art in this area has been the subject of vigorous–and sometimes acerbic–debate over decades, both with regards to its meaning and function [e.g., 24 , 51 , 53 – 59 ] and its time of creation [e.g., 24 , 28 , 36 , 52 , 54 , 55 , 60 , 61 63 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bard, 1979; Bednarik, 2010, 2012; Dietzel et al, 2008; Dragovich, 2000; Guagnin et al, 2018; Whitley et al, 2017). Numerous attempts have been conducted to date petroglyphs by a variety of methods, including radiometric techniques, cation ratio changes, microlaminations, varnish thickness, colorimetric analysis, and so on (Bednarik, 2009, 2010; Bednarik and Khan, 2005; Francis et al, 1993; Liu and Broecker, 2013; Sowers, 2013; Whitley, 2012). In many cases, the results have been disappointing, as discussed in several reviews (Bednarik, 2010; Dorn, 2007; Sowers, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several attempts have been made, such as carbon isotope dating, U-series dating of precipitated carbonates, OSL-dating of quartz grains covered by mineral encrustations, the degree of exfoliation, colorimetry of repatination, microerosion, superimposition sequences, and development of macro-wanes (Bednarik, 2017; Bednarik and Khan, 2005). However, many of these techniques were unsuccessful and much of the work is highly controversial (Whitley, 2012). Indirect dating by microerosion measurements, conducted by Bednarik and Khan (2005), appears to have been successful, but it exhibits several other difficulties, such as the need of a valid calibration curve, the frequent lack of feldspar within the sandstones, and the need to assume a constant climate (Bednarik, 2017; Bednarik and Khan, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%