2019
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2019.1263.34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro mutation on chrysanthemums

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shoot length decreased with gamma ray treatments compared to control. We got the similar results according to a prior article we published the increasing gamma treatment dosages caused the decrease in shoot lengths (Haspolat et al, 2019). We detected smaller flower head diameters and color shifts to pink (8.5%) in our other evaluation of the study's initial selected group of mutants (Haspolat et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Shoot length decreased with gamma ray treatments compared to control. We got the similar results according to a prior article we published the increasing gamma treatment dosages caused the decrease in shoot lengths (Haspolat et al, 2019). We detected smaller flower head diameters and color shifts to pink (8.5%) in our other evaluation of the study's initial selected group of mutants (Haspolat et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Explants were quickly subcultured after being exposed to radiation. To calculate the effective mutation dose, shoot lengths were measured in the 60 th day of regeneration (Figure 1d) (Haspolat et al, 2019).…”
Section: Effective Mutation Dose Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%