In Vitro Shear Bond Strength of Three Self-adhesive Resin Cements and a Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement to Various Prosthodontic Substrates

Sabatini, Camila; Patel, Manthan; D'Silva, Eric

doi:10.2341/11-317-l

Cited by 48 publications

(32 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The bond strength of self-adhesive resin composite cement to other dental framework materials such as base metal alloy (14.3 MPa), zirconia ceramic (16.6 MPa) or lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (12 MPa) are comparable to the values measured in this study 24) . Also, a previous study reported that the bond with PMMA-based veneering resins yielded significantly higher bond strength values to polymeric CAD/CAM materials than with compositebased veneering resins 20) .…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 81%

Effect of different adhesives combined with two resin composite cements on shear bond strength to polymeric CAD/CAM materials

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study tested the impact of different adhesives and resin composite cements on shear bond strength (SBS) to polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)-and composite-based CAD/CAM materials. SBS specimens were fabricated and divided into five main groups (n=30/group) subject to conditioning: 1. Monobond Plus/Heliobond (MH), 2. Visio.link (VL), 3. Ambarino P60 (AM), 4. exp. VP connect (VP), and 5. no conditioning-control group (CG). All cemented specimens using a. Clearfil SA Cement and b. Variolink II were stored in distilled water for 24 h at 37°C. Additionally, one half of the specimens were thermocycled for 5,000 cycles (5°C/55°C, dwell time 20 s). SBS was measured; data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, four-and one-way ANOVA, unpaired two-sample t-test and Chi 2 -test. CAD/CAM materials without additional adhesives showed no bond to resin composite cements. Highest SBS showed VL with Variolink II on composite-based material, before and after thermocycling.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 81%

Effect of different adhesives combined with two resin composite cements on shear bond strength to polymeric CAD/CAM materials

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…On the other hand, the bond strength cemented with RelyX Unicem to other dental framework materials such as base metal (14.3 MPa), zirconia (16.6 MPa) or lithium disilicate glass-ceramic: (12 MPa) are in the same range of values compared to PEEK combined with Visio.link or Signum PEEK Bond [22].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 90%

Influence of plasma pretreatment on shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to polyetheretherketone

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to evaluate the adhesion between PEEK and two selfadhesive resin cements after plasma treatment. METHODS: Eight hundred sixty-four polyetheretherketone (PEEK) disks were cut and polished to silicon carbide (SIC) P4000. One half of the specimens were randomly selected and pretreated with plasma, whereas the remaining 432 specimens remained untreated. Subsequently, specimens were randomly allocated to four groups (n = 108/group): Visio.link (Bredent), Signum PEEK Bond (Heraeus Kulzer), Ambarino P60 (Creamed), and a control group without additional treatment. Half of the specimens of each group (n = 54) were then cemented with either RelyX Unicem Automix 2 (3 M ESPE) or with Clearfil SA (Kuraray). All specimens were stored in water for 24 h (37°C ). Afterwards, specimens were divided into three groups (n = 18) for different aging levels: (1) no aging (baseline measurement), (2) thermal aging for 5,000 cycles (5/55°C), and (3) thermal aging for 10,000 cycles (5/55°C). Thereafter, shear bond strengths (SBS) were measured, and failure types (adhesive, mixed, and cohesive) were assessed. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, four-and one-way ANOVA followed by a post hoc Scheffé test (p < 0.05). RESULTS: No adhesion could be established without adhesive pretreatment, irrespectively, whether plasma was applied or not. Also, no bond strength was measured when Ambarino P60 was applied. In contrast, adhesive pretreatment resulted in SBS ranging between 8 and 15 MPa. No significant differences were found between the resin cements used. In general, no cohesive failures were observed. Groups without plasma treatment combined with Visio.link or Signum PEEK Bond showed predominantly mixed failure types. Control groups, plasma treated, or treated using Ambarino P60 groups fractured predominantly adhesively. CONCLUSION: The use of methyl methacrylate (MMA)-based adhesives allows bonding between PEEK and self-adhesive resin cements. Plasma treatment has no impact on bond to resin cements. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: PEEK reconstructions can be cemented using self-adhesive resin cements combined with pretreatment with MMA-based adhesives. Methods: Eight-hundred-and-sixty-four PEEK disks were cut and polished to silicon carbide (SIC) P4000. One half of the specimens was randomly selected and pre-treated with plasma, whereas the remaining 432 specimens remained untreated. Subsequently, specimens were randomly allocated to four groups (n=108/group): Visio.link (Bredent), Signum PEEK Bond (Heraeus Kulzer), Ambarino P60 (Creamed) and a control group without additional treatment. Half of the specimens of each group (n=54) were then cemented with either RelyX Unicem Automix 2 (3M ESPE) or with Clearfil SA (Kuraray).All specimens were storage in water for 24 h (37°C). Afterwards, specimens were divided into three groups (n=18) for different aging levels: i. no aging (baseline measurement), ii.thermal aging for 5000 cycles (5/55°C) and iii. thermal aging for 10000 cycles (5/55°C).Thereafte...

show abstract

“…For this study RelyX Unicem was selected as adhesive bonding because among tested framework materials it had the most reliable bond strength 26) . RelyX Unicem showed shear bond strength of 13.4-17.1 MPa to alloy, 16.2-16.6 MPa to zirconia, 12-13.4 MPa to glass-ceramic and 29-37.4 MPa to resin 26) . In contrast, Ketac Cem is the most widely used glass ionomer cement and was therefore tested in this study.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of cementation and cement type on the fracture load testing methodology of anterior crowns made of different materials

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To evaluate the influence of cementation on fracture load of anterior crowns made of CAD/CAM-resin-blocks (ART), leucite-reinforced glass-ceramics (LRG), lithium disilicate ceramics (LIT), veneered zirconia (ZRO) and veneered alloy (DEG). Each crown group (n=15/ subgroup) was cemented on the metal abutment as follows: i. using glass ionomer, ii. using self-adhesive resin cement, and iii. not cemented. Crowns were tested and analyzed with 2-way and 1-way ANOVA (Scheffé test), and Weibull statistics (p<0.05). Within LRG, self-adhesive cemented subgroup showed higher fracture load compared to other groups (p<0.001). Among DEG, lower results were measured for non-cemented crowns than for cemented (p<0.001). For ART, LIT and ZRO no influence of cementation was observed. For fracture load test methodology, metal ceramic crowns should be generally cemented. Glass-ceramic crowns should be cemented using adhesive cement. Cementation and cement type did not have an influence on the fracture load results for resin, zirconia or lithium disilicate crowns.

show abstract

In Vitro Shear Bond Strength of Three Self-adhesive Resin Cements and a Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement to Various Prosthodontic Substrates

Cited by 48 publications

References 23 publications

Effect of different adhesives combined with two resin composite cements on shear bond strength to polymeric CAD/CAM materials

Effect of different adhesives combined with two resin composite cements on shear bond strength to polymeric CAD/CAM materials

Influence of plasma pretreatment on shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to polyetheretherketone

Influence of cementation and cement type on the fracture load testing methodology of anterior crowns made of different materials

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About