2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ortho.2022.100634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo methods for evaluating human midpalatal suture maturation and ossification: An updated review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the strengths of this systematic review is that it is the first one to assess the methodological quality of the articles related to this topic using the Quality assessment of the included studies using the Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies tool (National Heart et al, 2017). This differentiates this systematic review from other reviews in which a quality review was not performed (Isfeld et al, 2017;Kao et al, 2018;Mahdian et al, 2019) and another in which intra and interoperator agreements were used as a variable to evaluate this item (Gao et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the strengths of this systematic review is that it is the first one to assess the methodological quality of the articles related to this topic using the Quality assessment of the included studies using the Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies tool (National Heart et al, 2017). This differentiates this systematic review from other reviews in which a quality review was not performed (Isfeld et al, 2017;Kao et al, 2018;Mahdian et al, 2019) and another in which intra and interoperator agreements were used as a variable to evaluate this item (Gao et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future observational studies should be performed/reported according to guidelines such as STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) (Gao et al, 2022) to increase evidence-based practice information about this topic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14] Occlusal radiographs had been used; however, they were reported to be an unreliable after recording 50% of the films with false-positive results, [16] in addition to superimposition of adjacent structures which made their use to diminish in this regard and replaced by CT which allows the threedimensional (3D) assessment of sutural changes without superimpositions. [17,18] Furthermore, (CBCT) was used to detect MPS ossification [14,19] with lower cost, reduced imaging time, and at lower radiation dose compared to CT. [20,21] As such, this study aimed to use CBCT in the 3D quantitative and morphologic assessment of MPS maturation with age in support of its utility in orthodontic practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the creation of this method, some systematic revisions have been performed [ 45 , 46 , 47 ], but this is the first article to systematically assess and standardize the calibration, training, blinding processes, and randomization of the images that each one of the articles used. This is of vital importance to ensure the internal validity of each study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%