2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11869-020-00927-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inactivation times from 290 to 315 nm UVB in sunlight for SARS coronaviruses CoV and CoV-2 using OMI satellite data for the sunlit Earth

Abstract: UVB in sunlight, 290–315 nm, can inactivate SARS CoV and SARS CoV-2 viruses on surfaces and in the air. Laboratory exposure to ultraviolet irradiance in the UVC range inactivates many viruses and bacteria in times less than 30 min. Estimated UVB inactivation doses from sunlight in J/m2 are obtained from UVC measurements and radiative transfer calculations, weighted by a virus inactivation action spectrum, using OMI satellite atmospheric data for ozone, clouds, and aerosols. For SARS CoV, using an assumed UVC d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
60
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
60
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, viral inactivation may not be possible in low UV environments, including at levels experienced in many European cities around the winter solstice ( 89 ). These findings have been largely reproduced in other modeling studies ( 90 , 91 ). While germicidal UVC is likely more effective, there is evidence that other wavelengths of light have germicidal properties, including, far-UVC (222 nm), UVB, UVA, visible (400–700 nm) and infrared ( 92 ).…”
Section: Could Uv Light Have Harmful or Beneficial Effects On Covid-1supporting
confidence: 79%
“…However, viral inactivation may not be possible in low UV environments, including at levels experienced in many European cities around the winter solstice ( 89 ). These findings have been largely reproduced in other modeling studies ( 90 , 91 ). While germicidal UVC is likely more effective, there is evidence that other wavelengths of light have germicidal properties, including, far-UVC (222 nm), UVB, UVA, visible (400–700 nm) and infrared ( 92 ).…”
Section: Could Uv Light Have Harmful or Beneficial Effects On Covid-1supporting
confidence: 79%
“…Solar UV-B radiation is one of the factors affecting the lifetime of SARS-CoV-2 on surfaces contaminated by the virus as well as in respiratory droplets. Inactivation times (greater than 10 min as shown below) are considered too long to protect against transmission among people who are in close proximity outdoors [ 502 ]. The distinction between transmission via respiratory droplets and fomites is difficult to discern because persons who come into contact with potentially infectious surfaces often also have close contact with an infectious individual.…”
Section: Linkages Between Covid-19 Solar Uv Radiation and The Montrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, there are four studies that have estimated the inactivation time t 10 , which is defined as the time that reduces the number of viable SARS-CoV-2 viruses to 10% of its initial number upon exposure to solar UV radiation [ 502 , 524 526 ]. Ratnesar-Shumate et al .…”
Section: Linkages Between Covid-19 Solar Uv Radiation and The Montrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…COVID-19 is caused by a novel coronavirus, SARS coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), belonging to the genus Betacoronavirus, family Coronaviridae [1][2][3][4]. Since coronaviruses are enveloped RNA viruses, many disinfectants such as a variety of detergents and alcohols, such as ethanol and 2-propanol, have been shown to inactivate SARS-CoV-2 infectivity [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%