Inadequate vertical bone dimension managed by indirect sinus grafting technique and simultaneous implant placement

Nandal, Shikha; Ghalaut, Pankaj; Nandal, Deepika

doi:10.4103/0975-5950.201355

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The strength of osseointegration is usually determined by implant stability. 11,12,14,15,21 The mean initial ISQ values at surgery in both groups were 39.00±2.16 and 40.00±2.12, respectively, in this sample. The ISQ levels at the time of operation are low when compared to the values at 6 months, which are 70.43 and 68.71.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 68%

“…The hydraulic lifter in the CAS kit, on the other hand, was not a very convenient. As a result, investigators concluded that sinus lift devices need to be improved or developed further to make them safer and more user-friendly 9,15 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Direct-Implant-Valve Approach (DIVA) was recently manufactured using an internal sealing screw for bone augmentation supply system and potential endoscopic direct monitoring via its channel. DIVA was used when implant needed to be combined with MSL and/or bone augmentation 15 . A small number of studies evaluated DIVA's efficacy in crestal MSL with simultaneous implant insertion to other techniques that used hydraulic pressure for MSL and simultaneous implant insertion 16 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Clinical and radiological comparison of a dynamic implant valve vs a hydraulic maxillary sinus lift augmentation technique with simultaneous implant insertion

Baiomy

El-Sayed

Gawish

et al. 2022

ijhs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study aimed to compare between dynamic implant valve (DIVA) and the crestal ballooning techniques in elevating the maxillary sinus membrane (MSM) in conjunction with simultaneous implantation. Patients and methods: 20-patient prospective clinical cohort study. Ages ranged from 42 to 53 years, and had atrophic edentulous maxillae in the posterior region. To determine maxillary sinus status, patients were investigated utilizing intraoral clinical photographs and CBCT series. Closed Sinus Lifting done and compared between DIVA and ballooning techniques on patients who were randomly separated into two equal groups. The predicted research variables were intraoperative primary stability and level of sinus membrane lift. The main outcome factors were secondary implant Osseointegration stability (ISQ) and the amount of bone height gain. Results: Before surgery, the DIVA and Balloon groups had mean bone heights of 5.8 ± 0.67mm and 6.8 ± 0.86mm , which increased significantly to 12.8± 0.53 and 10.8± 0.67 after 6 months postoperatively. ISQ for DIVA and Balloon groups were 39.0± 2.16 and 40.0±2.16 preoperatively, respectively, and increased to 71.7±1.60 and 70.4±1.27 nine months postoperatively which was significantly higher at 3 months in DIVA group.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 68%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Clinical and radiological comparison of a dynamic implant valve vs a hydraulic maxillary sinus lift augmentation technique with simultaneous implant insertion

Baiomy

El-Sayed

Gawish

et al. 2022

ijhs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Concept of Implant Placement in Deficient Posterior Maxillary Bone by Osseodensification Technique

Kolhe,

Wawle,

Naphade

et al. 2024

Dentistry and Medical Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: The aim of this study was to analyze new bone formed after indirect sinus lift using Densah bur at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. Materials and Methods: This study is a randomized control trial. Fifteen patients with edentulous deficient posterior maxilla were recruited for the surgery by osseodensification (OD) technique. This study enrolled healthy adults aged 18 and older, with good oral health, who required one or more dental implants in the posterior maxilla to support fixed rehabilitations such as single crowns or fixed partial prostheses. Inclusion criteria comprised individuals with sufficient buccopalatal width, a minimum of 3.5 mm residual bone height at the intended edentulous area, and an absence of diagnosed bone diseases or medications known to impact bone metabolism. Periotest was used for analysis. Results: At preoperative, residual bone height was only 5.65 (1.87) mm which increased to 12.13 (0.87) mm at postoperative immediate levels, and remained stable at 11.97 (0.85) mm at 6 months postoperative and at 11.4 (0.8) mm at 1-year postoperative. On overall comparison of bone measurements at different time intervals using repeated measures analysis of variance F-test, there was found to be highly statistically significant (P < 0.001) difference among overall comparison in relation to bone height. Conclusion: For the treatment of low-density edentulous areas, especially in individuals with osteoporosis, the OD technique involving the reversal of drilling direction is a reliable and straightforward method that does not necessitate specialized equipment.

show abstract

Inadequate vertical bone dimension managed by indirect sinus grafting technique and simultaneous implant placement

Abstract: Implant placement into the posterior maxilla often creates a challenge due to inadequate bone height because of close sinus proximity. This article presents a case report of indirect sinus lift technique involving hydraulic pressure to elevate the floor of the maxillary sinus.

Cited by 2 publications

References 8 publications

Clinical and radiological comparison of a dynamic implant valve vs a hydraulic maxillary sinus lift augmentation technique with simultaneous implant insertion

Clinical and radiological comparison of a dynamic implant valve vs a hydraulic maxillary sinus lift augmentation technique with simultaneous implant insertion

Concept of Implant Placement in Deficient Posterior Maxillary Bone by Osseodensification Technique

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About