1978
DOI: 10.1097/00006250-197805000-00020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence of Staphylococcus aureus for an Obstetric Population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall S. aureus nares colonization rate of 22.0% noted in this study is higher than the only other investigation addressing nasal colonization among asymptomatic gravidas, noting a 4.0% S. aureus nasal colonization in 1978 [ 6 ]. Chen et al recently published S. aureus colonization rates from rectovaginal specimens collected for routine group B streptococcus (GBS) cultures done between 35–37 weeks of gestation and found that 17.1% of nearly 3000 women also had evidence for genital S. aureus colonization [ 13 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The overall S. aureus nares colonization rate of 22.0% noted in this study is higher than the only other investigation addressing nasal colonization among asymptomatic gravidas, noting a 4.0% S. aureus nasal colonization in 1978 [ 6 ]. Chen et al recently published S. aureus colonization rates from rectovaginal specimens collected for routine group B streptococcus (GBS) cultures done between 35–37 weeks of gestation and found that 17.1% of nearly 3000 women also had evidence for genital S. aureus colonization [ 13 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…The carriage rate for S. aureus and MRSA among women presenting for obstetric care has not been recently evaluated. An evaluation published in 1978 of S. aureus nasal colonization among asymptomatic gravidas admitted to labor and delivery documented a 4% colonization rate [ 6 ]. The importance of S. aureus colonization as a marker for subsequent surgical-site infectious morbidity is well documented [ 7 , 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two clinical entities were chosen because published reports demonstrate that S aureus is a major pathogen in these two outcomes. 11,29,50 Other potential burdensome infections of perinatal importance such as chorioamnionitis and/or postpartum endometritis were not included due to the lack of formal reports documenting MRSA as a direct cause of these intrauterine infections. In addition, a recent investigation by Thurman et al 51 (including pregnant women) documents a high rate of vulvar abscesses attributable to MRSA, thus highlighting the overall increasing burden.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%