fMRI 2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-34342-1_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidental Findings in Neuroimaging Research: Ethical Considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A Magstim Rapid 2 Stimulator and a 70 mm diameter figure‐of‐eight coil (Magstim, Whitland, Wales, UK) were used to deliver the stimulation pulses. The coil was held parallel to the midline with the handle pointing downward, and the coil center was held tangential to the surface of the skull to minimize coil–cortex distance and thereby maximize the TMS effect (Ulmer & Jansen, 2010). rTMS was delivered to the stimulation site at the participant's PT to minimize interindividual variability in visual cortical excitability thresholds (Stewart et al., 2001).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Magstim Rapid 2 Stimulator and a 70 mm diameter figure‐of‐eight coil (Magstim, Whitland, Wales, UK) were used to deliver the stimulation pulses. The coil was held parallel to the midline with the handle pointing downward, and the coil center was held tangential to the surface of the skull to minimize coil–cortex distance and thereby maximize the TMS effect (Ulmer & Jansen, 2010). rTMS was delivered to the stimulation site at the participant's PT to minimize interindividual variability in visual cortical excitability thresholds (Stewart et al., 2001).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brown and Hasso (2008) argued that disclosure of IFs should be addressed in the research study design, suggesting that no neuroimaging study be approved by an IRB if a protocol for reporting unexpected findings to participants and for initiating treatment for these findings is not delineated in the research proposal. Because no uniform national or international policy exists for such protocols, neuroethicists largely suggest that researchers within the neuroimaging community petition their home IRB to enforce the inclusion of such a protocol in research proposals (Brown & Hasso, 2008; Ulmer et al, 2013). …”
Section: The State Of the Debatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a clinical protocol might include a T1-weighted image to acquire an anatomical overview; a T2-weighted image sequence that provides good pathological information; and a diffusion weighted image or a fluid-attenuated inversion recovery image, which can be used to detect hyperacute and acute cerebral infarct, respectively (Rorden & Karnath, 2004). Depending on the question at hand, other additional orthogonal acquisitions may be required as well or contrast agents may be needed (Ulmer et al, 2013). Thus, to reliably detect an abnormality and to make a reasonable clinical judgment about an IF would require collection of MR images beyond what may be necessary for research.…”
Section: Practical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) functional MRI (fMRI) techniques have been widely adopted for studying patterns of activation in neural systems and networks of the healthy and the diseased brain (see References 1 and 2 for overviews). While informative, a more comprehensive understanding of complex mental phenomena requires consideration across multiple complementary ‘levels of explanation’ 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%