2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporating stochastic correlations into mining project evaluation using the Jacobi process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, its drawbacks include a slow rate and complexity with many nodes, making it challenging to perform and impractical in certain situations. This model has been applied in mining investment valuation in various studies (Ajak & Topal, 2015;Ardian & Kumral, 2020;Dehghani et al, 2014).…”
Section: Option Pricing Trees (Binomial Model)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, its drawbacks include a slow rate and complexity with many nodes, making it challenging to perform and impractical in certain situations. This model has been applied in mining investment valuation in various studies (Ajak & Topal, 2015;Ardian & Kumral, 2020;Dehghani et al, 2014).…”
Section: Option Pricing Trees (Binomial Model)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the alternatives of stochastic models for the real options valuation, there is the use of Geometric Brownian Motion (GBM) for price modelling (Berk and Podhraski, 2018) with a linear stochastic solution using the Itô's lemma (Maeda and Watts, 2019). In addition, the GBM simulates the prices of the underlying asset following a random walk with constant volatility (Ardian and Kumral, 2020), assuming a lognormal probability distribution when the ratio between the expected price and the present price has independence from the past price history (Angstmann et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%