“…This classical residue-specific modification chemistry, however, is rarely sufficiently selective to distinguish one residue within a sea of chemical functionality and for this reason more intricate approaches have been developed in recent times to introduce a unique chemical handle in the target protein that is orthogonal to the remainder of the proteome (Hackenberger & Schwarzer, 2008). Direct incorporation of non-canonical amino acids into proteins via the subversion of the biosynthetic machinery is an attractive means of introducing selectively new functionality by either a site-specific or residue-specific manner (Beatty & Tirrell, 2009;de Graaf et al, 2009;Johnson et al, 2010;Liu & Schultz, 2010;Voloshchuk & Montclare, 2010;Young & Schultz, 2010) that in combination with recent and notorious advances in bioorthogonal reactions (nucleophilic addition to carbonyl, 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reactions, Diels-Alder reactions, olefin cross-metathesis reactions and palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions) has allowed an exquisite level of selectivity in the covalent modification of proteins (Wiltschi & Budisa, 2008;Sletten & Bertozzi, 2009;Lim & Lin, 2010;Tiefenbrunn & Dawson, 2010). In spite that major technical challenges have been overcome, a prodigious amount of lab work and the concurrently optimization of a larger set of parameters is normally required for those advanced and selective methodologies in comparison with conventional organic reaction development.…”