2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.05.14.095950
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased microclimatic variation in artificial nests does not create ecological traps for a secondary cavity breeder

Abstract: 14Artificial devices are increasingly used in conservation measures to mitigate the 15 disappearance of natural habitats. However, few studies have demonstrated their benefits for 16 the target species, and they may pose a risk of creating ecological traps. This occurs when 17 lower individual fitness is found in artificial habitats that are more attractive than their natural 18 equivalents. In this study, we tested the ecological trap hypothesis on a dense population of 19 European rollers Coracias garrulu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nest boxes are used globally to increase the availability of den and nest sites for hollow-dependent species (Newton, 1994). However, questions have been raised about the suitability of the microclimatic conditions they provide (Isaac et al 2008;Rowland et al 2017), and studies from different systems have yielded mixed conclusions regarding their thermal suitability (Goldingay, 2020;Schwartz et al 2020). Previous studies have focussed largely on the microclimate of unoccupied artificial dens (Goldingay, 2015;Rowland et al 2017;Griffiths et al 2018, although see Goldingay & Thomas, 2021), but this fails to account for the potentially confounding effect of individual heat production (Kearney et al 2011;Maziarz, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nest boxes are used globally to increase the availability of den and nest sites for hollow-dependent species (Newton, 1994). However, questions have been raised about the suitability of the microclimatic conditions they provide (Isaac et al 2008;Rowland et al 2017), and studies from different systems have yielded mixed conclusions regarding their thermal suitability (Goldingay, 2020;Schwartz et al 2020). Previous studies have focussed largely on the microclimate of unoccupied artificial dens (Goldingay, 2015;Rowland et al 2017;Griffiths et al 2018, although see Goldingay & Thomas, 2021), but this fails to account for the potentially confounding effect of individual heat production (Kearney et al 2011;Maziarz, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2017), and studies from different systems have yielded mixed conclusions regarding their thermal suitability (Goldingay, 2020; Schwartz et al . 2020). Previous studies have focussed largely on the microclimate of unoccupied artificial dens (Goldingay, 2015; Rowland et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%