Increased proximal vertebral rotation is associated with shoulder imbalance after posterior spinal fusion for severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Machida, Masayoshi; Rocos, Brett; Lebel, David E; Zeller, Reinhard

doi:10.1007/s43390-022-00510-y

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The preoperative clusters demonstrated by Pasha et al [70] had statistically significant differences in proximal thoracic (PT), main thoracic (MT), and thoracolumbar/ lumbar (TL/L) Cobb angle. Machida et al [74] reported that postoperative Cobb angle and AVR in the PT curve had small to moderate association with radiographic shoulder height differences up to the 2-year follow-up.…”

Section: Coronal Cobb Anglementioning

confidence: 99%

Patient and surgical predictors of 3D correction in posterior spinal fusion: a systematic review

Wan

Wong

et al. 2023

Eur Spine J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Restoration of three-dimensional (3D) alignment is critical in correcting patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using posterior spinal fusion (PSF). However, current studies mostly rely on 2D radiographs, resulting in inaccurate assessment of surgical correction and underlying predictive factors. While 3D reconstruction of biplanar radiographs is a reliable and accurate tool for quantifying spinal deformity, no study has reviewed the current literature on its use in evaluating surgical prognosis. Purpose To summarize the current evidence on patient and surgical factors affecting sagittal alignment and curve correction after PSF based on 3D parameters derived from reconstruction of biplanar radiographs. Methods A comprehensive search was conducted by three independent investigators on Medline, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to obtain all published information on predictors of postoperative alignment and correction after PSF. Search items included "adolescent idiopathic scoliosis," "stereoradiography," "three-dimensional," "surgical,” and "correction." The inclusion and exclusion criteria were carefully defined to include clinical studies. Risk of bias was assessed with the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool, and level of evidence for each predictor was rated with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach. 989 publications were identified, with 444 unique articles subjected to full-text screening. Ultimately, 41 articles were included. Results Strong predictors of better curve correction included preoperative normokyphosis (TK > 15°), a corresponding rod contour, intraoperative vertebral rotation and translation, and upper and lower instrumented vertebrae selected based on sagittal and axial inflection points. For example, for Lenke 1 patients with junctional vertebrae above L1, fusion to NV-1 (1 level above the neutral vertebra) achieved optimal curve correction while preserving motion segments. Pre-op coronal Cobb angle and axial rotation, distal junctional kyphosis, pelvic incidence, sacral slope, and type of instrument were identified as predictors with moderate evidence. For Lenke 1C patients, > 50% LIV rotation was found to increase spontaneous lumbar curve correction. Pre-op thoracolumbar apical translation and lumbar lordosis, Ponte osteotomies, and rod material were found to be predictors with low evidence. Conclusions Rod contouring and UIV/LIV selection should be based on preoperative 3D TK in order to achieve normal postoperative alignment. Specifically, Lenke 1 patients with high-lying rotations should be fused distally at NV-1, while hypokyphotic patients with large lumbar curves and truncal shift should be fused at NV to improve lumbar alignment. Lenke 1C curves should be corrected using > 50% LIV rotation counterclockwise to the lumbar rotation. Further investigation should compare surgical correction between pedicle-screw and hybrid constructs using matched cohorts. DJK and overbending rods are potential predictors of postoperative alignment.

show abstract

Section: Coronal Cobb Anglementioning

confidence: 99%

Patient and surgical predictors of 3D correction in posterior spinal fusion: a systematic review

Wan

Wong

et al. 2023

Eur Spine J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The problem of double thoracic idiopathic scoliosis: a non-systematic literature review

Dolotin,

Lukinov,

Mikhaylovskiy

2023

Hir. pozvonoč.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective. To analyze the current situation in the community of spine surgeons regarding the determination of the zone of posterior spinal fusion for double thoracic idiopathic scoliosis.Material and Methods. The content of 16 publications containing the results of surgical correction of double thoracic scoliotic deformities was analyzed. The number of studied clinical cohorts was 25, of which in 13 groups only the right-sided main thoracic (MT) curve (MT group) was blocked, and in 12 – both MT and left-sided proximal upper thoracic (PT) curve (MT + PT group). Four parameters were analyzed in both groups: preoperative Cobb angle, preoperative curve mobility, deformity correction, and postoperative deformity progression.Results. Significant differences were found in the MT and MT + PT groups only in two cases: for the initial Cobb angle of the PT curve and the magnitude of its correction (Cobb angle before surgery minus Cobb angle immediately after the intervention). When choosing the extent of the instrumental fusion zone, the authors of the publications included in the review were guided, first of all, by the initial magnitude of the Cobb angle of the proximal thoracic curve. In the MT + PT group, it averaged 37–40° and was 11–13° more than in the MT group. At the same time, PT curve mobility in both groups is not statistically different. The achieved correction was statistically significantly greater in the МT + РT group, despite a more severe proximal curvature as compared to the MT group. Postoperative dynamics of kyphosis (both T2–T5 and T5–T12) is insignificant. The length of the instrumental spinal fusion zone has virtually no effect on the parameters of the sagittal contour of the thoracic spine. A fairly high frequency of the adding-on phenomenon development (20.6 %) indicates the presence of a connection between this complication and the dynamics of PT curve, but the available data are not enough to formulate a final conclusion. Literature data regarding patients’ self-assessment of quality of life after surgical treatment of Lenke types 1 and 2 scoliosis are scarce, although the majority of those operated on assess the result of treatment as positive.Conclusion. The problem of determining the extent of the instrumental fusion zone for double thoracic scoliosis remains unresolved. Most surgeons focus not so much on the mobility of the proximal curve, but on its magnitude. There is no consensus in predicting the development of the adding-on phenomenon; there is little information about changes in the quality of life of patients after surgery. New research is needed.

show abstract

Increased proximal vertebral rotation is associated with shoulder imbalance after posterior spinal fusion for severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Cited by 2 publications

References 29 publications

Patient and surgical predictors of 3D correction in posterior spinal fusion: a systematic review

Patient and surgical predictors of 3D correction in posterior spinal fusion: a systematic review

The problem of double thoracic idiopathic scoliosis: a non-systematic literature review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About