2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing the precision of canopy closure estimates from hemispherical photography: Blue channel analysis and under-exposure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Images were recorded in 2048 × 1536 pixels, the highest resolution setting possible on the camera. Maximum resolution was used because image analysis is performed based on pixel-by-pixel methods, and image resolution is a major factor reflecting the quality of hemispherical photographs (Jelaska et al 2006;Brusa and Bunker 2014). We took the hemispherical photographs on uniformly overcast days between July and August from 2005 to 2011.…”
Section: Gap Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Images were recorded in 2048 × 1536 pixels, the highest resolution setting possible on the camera. Maximum resolution was used because image analysis is performed based on pixel-by-pixel methods, and image resolution is a major factor reflecting the quality of hemispherical photographs (Jelaska et al 2006;Brusa and Bunker 2014). We took the hemispherical photographs on uniformly overcast days between July and August from 2005 to 2011.…”
Section: Gap Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1b). We extracted the blue channel, because it is less influenced by exposure changes compared to the red and green channel (Brusa and Bunker, 2014) and has the best contrast between sky and canopy (Frazer et al, 2001;Jonckheere et al, 2005).…”
Section: Acquisition Of Raw Imagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each method has advantages and disadvantages for estimating the various components of light availability and canopy structure. Some of them are very costly (e.g., LIDAR, LAI2000), others although cheap (e.g., densitometers, photosensitive diazo paper) are strongly subjective (Brusa & Bunker 2014). Hemispherical photography is an option of intermediate cost that has several advantages such as a spatial discrimination, acquisition of foliage angular distribution, and gap fractions at different zenith and azimuthal angles.…”
Section: Hemispherical Photographsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principle of this method is that a fish eye lens captures an image that spans a 180°a rc, and when pointed vertically can capture all possible angles of incoming light (Brusa & Bunker 2014). Other popular methods include the LAI-2000 ® (plant canopy analyzer -Li-cor, Lincoln, NE, USA), spherical densitometers, AccuPAR ® ceptometer (Decagon Devices, Pullman, WA, USA), LIDAR, TRAC (Tracing radiation and architecture of canopies), and photosensitive diazo paper (Jonckheere et al 2004, Chianucci & Cutini 2012, Brusa & Bunker 2014. There are several methods to determine light and canopy properties under a set of environmental conditions and ecosystems.…”
Section: Hemispherical Photographsmentioning
confidence: 99%