1996
DOI: 10.1142/9789812831064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Index Transforms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
117
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
117
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[18]). But finally we came to the conclusion that an application of index transforms [16] will be a rather effective tool to achieve the goal and give an affirmative answer to the question. Namely, we will explore composition and asymptotic properties of the Kontorovich-Lebedev transform with respect to the Haar measure dx…”
Section: Introduction and Auxiliary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[18]). But finally we came to the conclusion that an application of index transforms [16] will be a rather effective tool to achieve the goal and give an affirmative answer to the question. Namely, we will explore composition and asymptotic properties of the Kontorovich-Lebedev transform with respect to the Haar measure dx…”
Section: Introduction and Auxiliary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Hence we treat the integral over (−∞, M], appealing again to inequality (16) in order to justify a passage to the limit under the integral sign when λ → π…”
Section: A Solution To Salem's Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this paper is to obtain an analog of the Hausdorff-Young inequality [2] and the norm estimates for the following convolution operator (cf. [6,7,11]) (1.2) where K i (x) is the modified Bessel function of the second kind [1] with respect to the pure imaginary index = i . We will consider these operators in appropriate Lebesgue spaces.…”
Section: Introduction and Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will consider these operators in appropriate Lebesgue spaces. In particular, the convolution operator (1.1) is well defined in the Banach ring L (R + ) ≡ L 1 (R + ; K (x) dx), ∈ R (see [11,7]), i.e. the space of all summable functions f : R + → C with respect to the measure K (x) dx for which…”
Section: Introduction and Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The convolution corresponding with this transform has been investigated in great detail by S. B. Yakubovich [22] from a classical point of view and by H.-J. Glaeske and A. Hess [5] in spaces of generalized functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%