India’s Doctrinal Modifications: Counterforce Temptations in South Asia

Abstract

This paper assists in understanding contesting technological capabilities and doctrinal modification between India and Pakistan that are drifting South Asia towards instability, leaving the nuclear deterrence in a dark abyss. Hawks on both sides of the nuclear armed rivals are unprecedentedly chanting threats of nuclear war. More bothersome is the indications of shifting the Indian policy of No First Use (NFU), calls for doctrinal modifications and counterforce temptations. An Indian quest for escalation dominance and Pakistani quest for stability against India is in fact a mutual struggle beyond ‘minimum credible’ to ‘assured second strike’ capabilities.

Dynamics of Pakistan’s Nuclear Doctrine: Implications for Strategic Stability in South Asia

“…The Indian gamble under the CSD in all likelihood would be:to cross the international border (IB) and capture some territory for bargaining purposes. Methodologically, for a successful CSD, India aimed to assemble three to five IBGs within 72–96 hours’ notice and cross IB with the simultaneity of operations that will break the cohesion of the Pakistan army (Ali and Sidhu, 2021). …”

Strategic Dynamics of Crisis Stability in South Asia

“…Nevertheless, IAF’s cross-border airstrikes against the alleged terrorist camp near Balakot proved Indian “new normal” whether the terrorist facility was hit or not and whether a large number of terrorists were killed or not. Indian strikes on 26 February 2019 gave an impression that India is willing to respond with punitive strikes against Pakistan, whereas Pakistan’s response was a calibrated example of “quid pro quo plus.” On the very next day, shooting down an Indian MiG-21 Bison and capturing its pilot also proved Pakistan’s willingness to climb the second rung on the escalation ladder and restrained India from moving further up to the third rung of the escalation (Ali and Sidhu, 2021b). In a keynote address in London, Lt. Gen (Retd) Khalid Kidwai, contended,.…”