Controversies in Neuro-Oncology 1999
DOI: 10.1159/000061235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indications for Repeat Surgery of Glioblastoma: Influence of Progress of Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, most available studies are of retrospective design and assess only relatively small cohorts of patients. 10,13,16,17,20,26 When comparing repeat surgery with nonsurgical therapy from retrospective and prospective data, studies so far have failed to reveal a benefit from repeat resection. 11,18,27 Recently, a scale was suggested to select patients with recurrent/progressive glioblastomas for repeat resection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most available studies are of retrospective design and assess only relatively small cohorts of patients. 10,13,16,17,20,26 When comparing repeat surgery with nonsurgical therapy from retrospective and prospective data, studies so far have failed to reveal a benefit from repeat resection. 11,18,27 Recently, a scale was suggested to select patients with recurrent/progressive glioblastomas for repeat resection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a randomized study comparing the efficacy of implantable Carmustine wafers during reoperation for tumor relapse, Brem et al reported an increase of 6-month survival from 36% (placebo group) to 56% (Carmustine wafers group) [15]. Mortality rate for reintervention is 0-11% [9], surgical morbidity is 13-69% [1,11,16,17]. Age and KPS have been described to be associated with survival, as for newly diagnosed GBM [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%