2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2009.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indicator function based on complex contrasts and its application in general factorial designs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approach for qualitative factors taken by Evangelaras et al is unreasonable, as will be demonstrated in Example 5. Pang and Liu (2010) also proposed a generalized resolution based on complex contrasts. For designs with more than 3 levels, permuting levels for one or more factors will lead to different generalized resolutions according to their definition, which is unacceptable for qualitative factors.…”
Section: Generalized Resolution For Orthogonal Arraysmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The approach for qualitative factors taken by Evangelaras et al is unreasonable, as will be demonstrated in Example 5. Pang and Liu (2010) also proposed a generalized resolution based on complex contrasts. For designs with more than 3 levels, permuting levels for one or more factors will lead to different generalized resolutions according to their definition, which is unacceptable for qualitative factors.…”
Section: Generalized Resolution For Orthogonal Arraysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this example, we now compare the GR introduced here to proposals by Evangelaras et al (2005) and Pang and Liu (2010): The GRes values reported by Evangelaras et al (2005) for designs D 1 , D 2 and D 3 in the qualitative case are 3.75, 3.6464, 3.5, respectively; especially the 3.5 for the completely aliased design D 3 does not make sense. Pang and Liu reported values 3.75, 3.75 and 3, respectively; here, at least the completely aliased design D 3 is assigned the value "3."…”
Section: Rowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some other criteria are also proposed in literature, such as the minimum generalized aberration (see Ma and Fang [7]), the general minimum lower order confounding (see Zhang et al. [14]) and the minimum hybrid aberration (Pang and Liu [9]). More discussions about the criteria for designs with qualitative factors can be found in Mukerjee and Wu [8], Wu and Hamada [12] and references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17] For dealing with the multicomponent mixture systems, the first step is usually the determination of the number of ranks, or absorptive chemical components (ACCs), factors, principal components (PCs), and independent components (ICs), etc., in the mixtures. [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] Compared with empirical methods 19,20,[27][28][29][30] and pseudo-statistical methods, 21,22,25,31,32 statistical methods are based on well-established statistical principles and are free from questionable assumptions. 23,[33][34][35] The median absolute deviation (MAD) 35 is employed as a simple non-parametric statistical evaluation criterion with excellent robustness, 26,36 and it therefore was used for determination of the number of ACCs/ICs in the AKICA algorithm proposed here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%