2017
DOI: 10.1038/nature24273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indirect effects drive coevolution in mutualistic networks

Abstract: Ecological interactions have been acknowledged to play a key role in shaping biodiversity. Yet a major challenge for evolutionary biology is to understand the role of ecological interactions in shaping trait evolution when progressing from pairs of interacting species to multispecies interaction networks. Here we introduce an approach that integrates coevolutionary dynamics and network structure. Our results show that non-interacting species can be as important as directly interacting species in shaping coevol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
342
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 251 publications
(347 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
342
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The features we identified as most predictive for microbial biodiversity differed greatly between Eukaryotes and Prokaryotes, supporting the notion that microorganisms from these domains have different ecological roles [21, 24, 27, 28]. In contrast to this, the most predictive features for the different alpha diversity indices calculated from Prokaryotic sequences show a high degree of similarity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The features we identified as most predictive for microbial biodiversity differed greatly between Eukaryotes and Prokaryotes, supporting the notion that microorganisms from these domains have different ecological roles [21, 24, 27, 28]. In contrast to this, the most predictive features for the different alpha diversity indices calculated from Prokaryotic sequences show a high degree of similarity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Rather, they enter complex webs, or networks, of interactions (Thompson, ). The structure of these networks is expected to drive co‐evolution (Guimarães, Pires, Jordano, Bascompte, & Thompson, ), populations’ stability (May, ; Melian & Bascompte, ; Pimm, ), species coexistence (Bastolla et al, ) and community productivity (Poisot, Mouquet, & Gravel, ). A major frontier in community ecology is thus to elucidate the drivers of the complex and repeatable patterns, or motifs, that we observe in ecological networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main limitation of the IHS model is that it only simulates the evolution of consumer species. In nature, consumption is likely to be a selective force that also drives resource species evolution (Thompson 1994, Guimarães et al 2017. We must admit that this simplification strongly reduces the realism of our model, especially when consumption has a strong effect on resource species fitness.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%