Individual and Team Technically Trained Sportsmen in Cheerleading

Epp, Tammy; Timofeeva, O. V.

doi:10.17238/issn1998-5320.2016.25.143

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The conducted studies state the need to improve materials of the program for choreographic training of athletes. (Epp & Timofeeva, 2016) researching the components of the technical preparation of athletes who perform in team competitive cheerleading programs, established that in the practice of sports with complex coordination of movements to musical accompaniment, coordination and musical and rhythmic readiness take an important place and are developing on complex basis. The researchers established there are interrelationship and dependence of the results of the competitions on the indicators of the technical preparation of the athletes.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Sports Achievements of Participants in Cheerleading Competitions by Rationalizing Refereeing

Synytsya,

Rybalko

et al. 2024

RREM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cheerleading is a popular sport that is developing and increasing the number of fans. Cheerleading is a subjective sport and therefore it requires a lot of attention. The aim of the study is to investigate, identify and scientifically substantiate effective ways of rationalizing the refereeing of cheerleading competitions. 105 cheerleading judges took part in the study. Based on the results of the survey, an experimental group of judges of II and III categories was formed, which consisted of 73 young judges (hereinafter referred to as novice judges), who were involved in the experiment. Among them, 35.6% have the II judge category, 64.4% – III. Among novice judges, 23.3% have 3 years of experience as judges, 42.5% – 2 years, the rest – 31.2% – 1 year. The conducted questionnaire of cheerleading judges showed that certain difficulties arise in the judging process: distraction of own athletes and their parents, judges or competition organizers (72.6%); a large number of athletes in the team (up to 24), a significant number of numbers in one nomination (11.0%); long and loud music (8.2%); violation of hygiene requirements (weak or significant lighting, unventilated room, draft, etc.) (8.2%). In addition, there is a need to store the performances in memory, for a qualitative assessment of all competitive performances. As a result of the conducted research, methodical recommendations were developed, as well as developed evaluation symbols and marks for use during competition that will help judges to qualitatively and fairly evaluate competitive performances; remember performances and correctly distribute participants.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%