2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2010.00042.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual Participation in Collective Action in the Context of a Caribbean Island State: Testing the Effects of Multiple Dimensions of Social Capital

Abstract: This article presents the findings of a case study examining the relationship between social capital and individual participation in collective action on a Caribbean island recovering from devastation inflicted by Hurricanes Ivan and Emily. Using data drawn from 114 residential surveys on the island of Carriacou, Grenada, over the summer of 2006, we empirically test social capital as a predictor of individual participation in both formal and informal civic events. In addition, we further the theoretical develo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison reveals a difference in the levels of confidence among the young people affected by the disaster in both regions; it also points to a reduction of confidence in institutions, particularly among individuals who were most affected. Jicha et al (2011) show that social capital is crucial in increasing individual participation in processes of collective action immediately following a disaster. Specifically, the authors conclude that the levels of associative practices, social networks, interpersonal confidence and reciprocity norms have an effect on participation in support activities after natural disasters, such as Hurricanes Ivan and Emily in the Caribbean.…”
Section: Social Capital and Disastersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison reveals a difference in the levels of confidence among the young people affected by the disaster in both regions; it also points to a reduction of confidence in institutions, particularly among individuals who were most affected. Jicha et al (2011) show that social capital is crucial in increasing individual participation in processes of collective action immediately following a disaster. Specifically, the authors conclude that the levels of associative practices, social networks, interpersonal confidence and reciprocity norms have an effect on participation in support activities after natural disasters, such as Hurricanes Ivan and Emily in the Caribbean.…”
Section: Social Capital and Disastersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We grounded the measurements developed for this study in these two components in an effort to gauge as many types of social capital (bonding, bridging, affective, and objective) as feasible. Other measurement approaches would be able to gauge more nuanced aspects of social capital, such as situational factors influencing the extent to which individuals trust others (Earle 2004) or community-wide norms of reciprocity (Jicha et al 2011), that might influence individuals' willingness and ability to take actions in response to changing environmental conditions. Also, our measure of social capital was directed only at intracommunity information transmission.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research in rural sociology suggests that social networks, interpersonal trust, and norms of reciprocity are three key components of social capital (Jicha et al. ). We focus mainly on the social network aspect of social capital in the relationships that we model.…”
Section: Theoretical Orientationmentioning
confidence: 99%