2014
DOI: 10.1007/s13752-014-0192-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individuality as a Theoretical Scheme. I. Formal and Material Concepts of Individuality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…the disintegration of the holobiont, seems to indicate that holobionts are not biological individuals. Criteria of biological individuality, however, are usually "inward-looking," drawing a sharp distinction between internal interconnections on the one hand and organism-environment interactions on the other; only features of the internal and the boundary that mediates the inside with the outside seem to be important for individuality (Sober 1991;Huneman 2014;Godfrey-Smith 2009;Pradeu 2010).…”
Section: Resident Microorganisms As Scaffolds Of Host Individualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the disintegration of the holobiont, seems to indicate that holobionts are not biological individuals. Criteria of biological individuality, however, are usually "inward-looking," drawing a sharp distinction between internal interconnections on the one hand and organism-environment interactions on the other; only features of the internal and the boundary that mediates the inside with the outside seem to be important for individuality (Sober 1991;Huneman 2014;Godfrey-Smith 2009;Pradeu 2010).…”
Section: Resident Microorganisms As Scaffolds Of Host Individualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fourth common feature induced by microbiome studies is a reconceptualization of the usual definitions of individuals worth considering as an explanans or as an explanandum by a given field. Thus, microbiome signatures are proposed to offer a novel proxy for their hosts identity, suggesting that, at least in a medico-legal context, and despite considerable philosophical debates on what defines individuals and identity over time in the first place [72,76,77], some practitioners are now tempted to equate (hence to reduce) the legal individuals to parts of their (changing) microbiomes. Such a reduction of an individual identity to aspects of its microbiome however is not the only ontological development with significant legal implications prompted by microbiome studies.…”
Section: Commonalities Across Novel Avenues Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 3 The discussion about the notion of the individual in biology is quite extensive: See Clarke (2010); Boniolo and Testa (2012); Huneman (2014a, 2014b); Sterner (2015); Godfrey-Smith (2016); Pradeu (2012); Lidgard and Nyhart (2017); Gilbert (2017); Baedke (2019). According to Hegel, the biological individual is a unitary structure in which its component parts cannot exist outside the relationship to the whole of which they are parts and in which the parts are such that they cannot be separated from the whole without changing its structure.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%