2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00068-020-01540-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induced membrane technique: a critical literature analysis and proposal for a failure classification scheme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since then, we have repeatedly published on IMT use in the various settings of our military practice. Like civilian authors, we have found that this technique achieves satisfying outcomes in bone union and complication rates [3,12,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. We have also demonstrated that IMT is suited for bone defects of ballistic origin and can be applied in the austere environment of forward surgical units [12,17,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Since then, we have repeatedly published on IMT use in the various settings of our military practice. Like civilian authors, we have found that this technique achieves satisfying outcomes in bone union and complication rates [3,12,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. We have also demonstrated that IMT is suited for bone defects of ballistic origin and can be applied in the austere environment of forward surgical units [12,17,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Although the practice of cement loading with antibiotics has been controversial, [ 23 ] in the herein study the cement spacer was loaded with gentamycininallpatients and ina recentmeta-analysis it was found that it decreased the need for revision. [ 24 ] We do not add methylene blue to the cement during the first stage as we have found no issues with cement identification during the second stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, they recommended further studies on the effect of BMP within IMT. Lastly, Mathieu et al 42 reviewed the 2 meta-analyses 8,12 and concluded that the addition of recombinant growth factor is still controversial because no clinical comparative study has proven their values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%