2005
DOI: 10.1378/chest.128.4_meetingabstracts.400s-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induced Sputum Versus Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy in Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[2829] Prospective studies have shown that induced sputum is more cost-effective and has similar diagnostic yield as BAL for detecting TB. [3031] A randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 100 subjects reported that although BAL had a higher yield as compared to induced sputum (65% vs. 45%), sputum examination was still useful and cost-effective. [32]…”
Section: Bronchoscopy Suite Setup and Staff Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2829] Prospective studies have shown that induced sputum is more cost-effective and has similar diagnostic yield as BAL for detecting TB. [3031] A randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 100 subjects reported that although BAL had a higher yield as compared to induced sputum (65% vs. 45%), sputum examination was still useful and cost-effective. [32]…”
Section: Bronchoscopy Suite Setup and Staff Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%