Industry 5.0: improving humanization and sustainability of Industry 4.0

Grabowska, Sandra; Saniuk, Sebastian; Gajdzik, Bożena

doi:10.1007/s11192-022-04370-1

Cited by 188 publications

(104 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

103

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…On the topic of inclusion/consideration of individuality and diversity, current studies address the opportunities and challenges of digital transformation for specific groups of employees [ 126 , 127 , 128 ]. Under the headings of sustainable and ethical organization [ 22 , 129 , 130 ], a wide variety of recent studies present contents that we have identified under the criterion of human-centered use of technical innovations. On the criterion of demand for a clear responsibility for occupational safety and health, research points to the problem of unclear categorizations of employers, employees and self-employed with regard to, e.g., platform work [ 131 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In this context, the use of digital technologies at work does not automatically result in a load-optimized work design or a deterioration of working conditions [ 4 , 12 , 19 ]. It is therefore important to design technically feasible and potentially economically positive developments of the digital transformation with a view to the human being in the system of work, and from a societal perspective, being prospectively positive and human-centered [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ]. However, it is still unclear what criteria should apply to the human-centered design of work in a world increasingly permeated by digitized work tools.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Criteria and Guidelines for Human-Centered Work Design in a Digitally Transformed World of Work: Findings from a Formal Consensus Process

Tegtmeier

Weber²,

Sommer

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the increasing digital transformation, work tasks are changing—in some cases, significantly. Our study addresses the question of whether the established criteria for work design are still sufficient or if they should get updated and additional criteria become necessary in the context of digitalization. In a multistage consensus process involving interdisciplinary groups of experts, we have identified specific criteria for the humane design of work in a world increasingly permeated by digitalized work tools. Starting with an expert workshop using a combined nominal group/focus group technique, followed by a real-time Delphi study, a content analysis and a five-stage peer comment process, we detected 13 criteria and 38 design guidelines for human-centered work in digital transformation. Mapping these with established criteria, it became apparent that some established criteria have experienced a new dynamic because of the digital transformation. For other criteria, a need for digitization-sensitive design is discernible. In addition, criteria have emerged whose necessity is rooted in the digital transformation. A diffusion and stronger interconnection of the various levels of the work system in connection with the digital transformation of work is apparent.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Criteria and Guidelines for Human-Centered Work Design in a Digitally Transformed World of Work: Findings from a Formal Consensus Process

Tegtmeier

Weber²,

Sommer

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The world had moved from when humans had challenges to trust in technologies and machines. The Industry 4.0 development has increased the interest in industrial humanization, sustainability and resilience (Grabowska, Saniuk, and Gajdzik 2022). Promising Industry 4.0 has proved smart, reliable, scalable, and affordable capabilities beyond physical limitations.…”

Section: Socio Challengesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Toward sustainability and resilience with Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0

Aheleroff¹,

Huang²,

Xu³

et al. 2022

Front. Manuf. Technol.

104

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is a recognized need for mass personalization for sustainability at scale. Mass personalization is becoming a leading research trend in the latest Industrial Revolution, whereas substantial research has been undertaken on the role of Industry 4.0 enabling technologies. The world is moving beyond mass customization, while manufacturing has led to mass personalization ahead of other industries. However, most studies have not treated human capabilities, machines, and technologies as sustainable collaboration. This research investigates mass personalization as a common goal under the latest Industrial revolutions. Also, it proposes a Reference Architecture Model for achieving mass personalization that contributes to understanding how Industry 5.0 enhances Industry 4.0 for higher resilience and sustainability through a human-centric approach. The study implies that Human Capital 5.0 leads collaboration with machines and technologies, bringing more value-added and sustainable products.

show abstract

“…Simulation tools and modeling must adapt to the requirements of the new concepts of Industry 5.0: changes do not happen overnight in the systems that will use these new trends. The challenges are to find suitable modeling and simulation tools to introduce the concepts of the new paradigm in each essential segment of the manufacturing and to draw a connection matrix between key enablers for Industry 4.0 and 5.0, particularly people, companies, and technology [136,137].…”

Section: Future Opportunities and Challengesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modeling and Simulation of Manufacturing Processes and Systems: Overview of Tools, Challenges, and Future Opportunities

Alquraish

2022

Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Manufacturing is an important part of the modern economy. It is characterized by complexity in terms of systems, approaches, and interactions with intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Numerous efforts have been developed to use modeling and simulation tools to improve manufacturing efficiency and productivity and to achieve maximum quality, especially with the different mutations in the factories of today. This paper reviews the conventional and modern tools used in manufacturing system design and production improvement. Challenges that need to be addressed by the simulation community are discussed in depth. Finally, the evolution, advances, current practices, and future opportunities are discussed in the context of the contemporary manufacturing industry.

show abstract

Industry 5.0: improving humanization and sustainability of Industry 4.0

Cited by 188 publications

References 32 publications

Criteria and Guidelines for Human-Centered Work Design in a Digitally Transformed World of Work: Findings from a Formal Consensus Process

Criteria and Guidelines for Human-Centered Work Design in a Digitally Transformed World of Work: Findings from a Formal Consensus Process

Toward sustainability and resilience with Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0

Modeling and Simulation of Manufacturing Processes and Systems: Overview of Tools, Challenges, and Future Opportunities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About