Inelastic response spectra of self-centering structures with the flag-shaped hysteretic response subjected to near-fault pulse-type ground motions

Abstract

Many studies on the inelastic response spectra have mainly focused on structures with the conventional hysteretic behavior. However, for self-centering structures with the flag-shaped (FS) hysteretic behavior, the corresponding study is limited. The primary aim of this study is to investigate the inelastic response spectra of self-centering structures with FS hysteretic behavior subjected to the near-fault pulse-type ground motion. To this end, the smooth FS hysteretic model based on Bouc–Wen model is developed, and the characteristics of pulse-type ground motions are described in detail. It is found that the general features of inelastic response spectra of the FS model are sensitive to the acceleration-, velocity-, and displacement-sensitive spectral regions of the ground motion. The inelastic displacement, velocity, acceleration, and ductility factor spectra of the FS hysteretic model for pulse-type ground motions are much larger than those for ordinary ground motions, while the residual displacement spectra under the two types of ground motions are both very small due to its self-centering capacity. Moreover, the inelastic response spectra are affected by the ground motion characteristics and structural hysteresis behavior, especially the large pulse period and peak ground velocity (PGV) significantly increase the inelastic displacement, velocity, and acceleration spectra.

Self-centering seismic-resistant structures: Historical overview and state-of-the-art

“…A capacity design approach can then be used to design the rest of the structure to remain near elastic and undamaged from the probable resistance of the self-centering system. Once the structure is designed, however, extensive nonlinear time history analyses still need to be performed following established PBSD specifications and guidelines to validate the performance of the structure, especially for structures with shorter periods or located at near-fault sites, which may experience increased peak seismic responses under certain circumstances (Christopoulos et al, 2003; Christopoulos and Filiatrault, 2006; Christopoulos et al, 2002a; Dong et al, 2021; Wiebe and Christopoulos, 2015a).…”