2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3285323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inequality, ICT and Financial Access in Africa

Abstract: Disclaimer: AFEA Working Papers describe research in progress by the author(s) that has been peerreviewed and forthcoming in scientific outlets. There is a tacit acknowledgement of anonymous referees for constructive suggestions and critiques that have helped improve the content and rigour of the study. Each research stands on its merit and the views expressed in AFEA Working Papers are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the AFEA, its Executive Board, or AFEA management.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

36
236
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(273 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
36
236
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the literature is consistent on the position that the potential for ICT penetration in SSA is high compared with other regions of the globe experiencing saturation levels (Penard, Poussing, Yebe, & Ella, ; Tchamyou, Erreygers, & Cassimon, ). This has led to a growing stream of literature on the relevance of mobile technologies in development outcomes (Abor, Amidu, & Issahaku, ; Afutu‐Kotey, Gough, & Owusu, ; Asongu, ; Asongu & Boateng, ; Hubani & Wiese, ; Muthinja & Chipeta, ; Tchamyou, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Second, the literature is consistent on the position that the potential for ICT penetration in SSA is high compared with other regions of the globe experiencing saturation levels (Penard, Poussing, Yebe, & Ella, ; Tchamyou, Erreygers, & Cassimon, ). This has led to a growing stream of literature on the relevance of mobile technologies in development outcomes (Abor, Amidu, & Issahaku, ; Afutu‐Kotey, Gough, & Owusu, ; Asongu, ; Asongu & Boateng, ; Hubani & Wiese, ; Muthinja & Chipeta, ; Tchamyou, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In order to investigate the overall effect of enhancing gender inclusion on inequality, net effects are computed, in accordance with the contemporary literature on interactive regressions (Asongu & Odhiambo, ; Tchamyou et al, ). For example, in the penultimate column of Table , the net impact on the Gini index from the enhancement of female employment is 0.010 (2 × [0.00009 × 113.19] + [−0.010]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, in order to enhance robustness of the estimations, the study complements the Gini coefficient with two more indicators of inequality that capture extreme points of the inequality distribution, namely, the Atkinson index and the Palma ratio. The Atkinson index is a measure of income inequality, which appreciates the percentage of total income that a specific society would forego in an attempt to have more income equality among its citizens. The Palma ratio represents national income shares of the top 10% of households to the bottom 40%. These three indicators have been used in recent inequality literature in order to enhance the robustness of results (Meniago & Asongu, ; Tchamyou, , ; Tchamyou, Erreygers, & Cassimon, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%