2021
DOI: 10.1002/vms3.464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infection prevention and control practices of ambulatory veterinarians: A questionnaire study in Finland

Abstract: Zoonotic pathogens are an occupational hazard for veterinarians (Baker & Gray, 2009;Jackson & Villarroel, 2012). Transmission routes of these pathogens to veterinarians include direct contact with colonized or infected animals and contact with a contaminated environment or fomites, such as medical equipment.Infection prevention and control (IPC) practices such as hand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using peat as bedding might be protective whereas wood-based bedding may be a risk factor (Table S5a). Hand hygiene practices are often suboptimal at stables (38). Better hand hygiene practices at case stables may be reactive action - we did not ask about practices used before the outbreak (Table S5a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using peat as bedding might be protective whereas wood-based bedding may be a risk factor (Table S5a). Hand hygiene practices are often suboptimal at stables (38). Better hand hygiene practices at case stables may be reactive action - we did not ask about practices used before the outbreak (Table S5a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using peat as bedding might be protective whereas wood-based bedding may be a risk factor (Table S5a). Hand hygiene practices are often suboptimal at stables [39]. Better hand hygiene practices at case stables may be reactive action – we did not ask about practices used before the outbreak (Table S5a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in paired C t values for qPCR internal control and SARS-CoV-2 genes were scored using paired t test. Statistical comparison of patient diagnostic parameters and ROC curves was performed by 2-sample Z test using online tool https://epitools.ausvet.com.au/ztesttwo ( 27 , 28 ). In every statistical analysis, a P value of ≤0.05 was considered significant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%