Inflammatory markers in patients with internal carotid artery stenosis

Abstract

IntroductionAvailable reports underline the significance of the inflammatory process in the development, progression and destabilisation of atherosclerotic plaques in the internal carotid artery (ICA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the degree of ICA stenosis, ultrasound plaque morphology and serum concentration of selected inflammatory markers.Material and methodsSixty-five patients with ICA stenosis > 50% (39 symptomatic) and 30 healthy volunteers were enrolled in the study. Clinical, neurological examination and laboratory evaluation (leucocyte count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen, tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukins (1β, 6 and 10), anti-cytomegalovirus IgG antibody titre) were performed. Stenosis grade ≥ 70%, ulcerations on the plaque surface and a hypoechoic (or predominantly hypoechoic) structure of the plaque, obtained by colour-coded duplex examination, were accepted as the characteristics of unstable stenoses.ResultsUnstable ultrasound features of ICA stenosis were found significantly more often in symptomatic than in asymptomatic patients (71.79% vs. 30.71% for stenosis degree ≥ 70%, p = 0.001 and 61.23% vs. 38.46% for unstable plaque morphology, p = 0.01). Patients with ICA stenosis had significantly higher serum concentrations of interleukin-6, fibrinogen, ESR and higher CRP values than the individuals from the control group (p = 0.001, p = 0.009, p = 0.036, p = 0.009 respectively). Patients with unstable plaques structure had significantly higher concentrations of TNF-α, interleukin-6, fibrinogen, higher number of leukocytes, monocytes and higher CRP values than patients with stable plaques (p = 0.008, p = 0.049, p = 0.012, p = 0.0002, p = 0.006, p = 0.0003 respectively). No significant differences in above-mentioned parameters between the groups with stenosis < 70% and ≥ 70% were found.ConclusionsThere is a relationship between the activity of the selected inflammatory markers in serum and atherosclerotic unstable internal carotid artery stenosis. There is no relationship between serum concentration of inflammatory markers and degree of carotid artery stenosis.

Carotid intima media thickness and blood biomarkers of atherosclerosis in patients after stroke or myocardial infarction

“…The sample size in our study is similar to what has been reported in other biomarker studies (11,31). It was not based on power calculations because the aim of the study was to address several biomarkers without prioritizing any of them.…”

“…We are not able to determine which antigens were responsible for the increased IC level. Nonetheless, our study adds negative data to the pool of mixed-positive evidence for C. pneumoniae and mixed evidence for H. pylori, CMV, or HSV (31-33). Of course, our results do not exclude the potential role of these biomarkers in the acute phase of IS or MI (13).…”

“…However, PCT was associated with established vascular risk factors and was not superior to hs-CRP (29,30). It also failed to identify patients with unstable carotid stenosis (31). …”

Accelerated atherosclerosis in patients with common variable immunodeficiency: Is it overlooked or absent?

“…Several pro-inflammatory cytokines, especially TNF-a, have been reported to promote atherosclerosis, and the concentration of TNF-a was found to be elevated in the serum of patients in the general population with atherosclerosis [5]. Trujillo et al [3] reported increased TNF-a production in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of CVID patients after stimulation with lipopolysaccharide compared to healthy subjects, consistent with CVID being a pro-inflammatory condition.…”

Relation of Pro-Inflammatory Markers in Men and Women With One Year Outcomes After Myocardial Infarction

“…ИМ, как при благоприятном, так и при неблагоприятном прогнозах. Концентрация СРБ при благоприятном прогнозе составляла у женщин 11,63 (8,47; 20,70) мг/л, у мужчин -11,70 (5,47; 19,30) мг/л (р=0,409); при неблагоприятном прогнозе -15,41 (8,62; 19,90) мг/л и 15 (6,99; 17,60) мг/л, соответственно, (р=0,742). Проанализировав уровень СРБ у мужчин и женщин с благоприятным и неблагоприятным прогнозами, в зависимости от возраста, гендерные различия не выявлены.…”