of grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] (Stewart, 1989) and maize (Zea mays L.) (Hanks, 1983).
Most of current theory on crop water use-yield relations has beenThe poor correlation between yield and ET is largely developed for intensively managed crops with well-developed canodue to the relative insensitivity of ET to management pies. In most agricultural systems of semiarid West Africa, low input levels and endemic environmental stress predominate. In farmers' for crops with leaf area indices Ͻ2 (Ritchie, 1983). For fields, leaf area index (LAI) of the staple grain, pearl millet [Pennipredictive purposes, Forest et al. (1990) and Payne setum glaucum (L.) R. Br.], may never reach 1. In contrast to dense (1997) used different empirical linear equations to relate canopied crops, pearl millet yield is little correlated with ET . Reduced pearl millet yield to ET as management intensity LAI decreases ET efficiency (kg dry matter mm Ϫ1 evaporation from changed. Forest et al. (1990), for example, estimated crop and soil surfaces) because evaporation (E ) from the soil surface pearl millet yields in Senegal using values of 3 kg grain constitutes a large portion of ET. Additionally, atmospheric water ha Ϫ1 mm Ϫ1 ET for the best of farmers' conditions, and vapor pressure deficit (e*-e) increases within sparse canopies due to 10 kg ha Ϫ1 mm Ϫ1 for intensive, researcher-managed consensible heat transfer from the soil surface, and small and irregular ditions. Such empirical equations, developed using qualroughness length of the canopy. Greater (e*-e) further decreases crop T efficiency (kg dry matter mm Ϫ1 transpiration) and therefore ET itative categorization of management intensity, may efficiency. Under low-input conditions, pearl millet ET efficiencieshave practical applications, such as forecasting regional are roughly one-third of those obtained under intensive management, food production. However, they are of limited sciensuggesting that T efficiency is also reduced by environmental stress, tific value.
especially soil nutrient deficiency. Environmental stresses also causeWhen LAI is small, a large fraction of solar radiation poor root development, which results in reduced crop water supply, is intercepted by the soil surface rather than by the plant and increased resistance to water uptake. Optimizing crop water use canopy. Therefore E typically constitutes a much larger of sparse pearl millet stands will require some form of nutrient input.
fraction of ET than would normally be observed inOther appropriate technologies include certain forms of intercropping dense canopy crops, especially when the soil surface is and agroforestry that have been traditionally practiced in parts of wet (Ritchie, 1972). For this reason, in sparse stands West Africa. These can improve soil nutrient availability, increase effective crop cover, and reduce canopy (e*-e).
Abbreviations: LAI, leaf area index; E, evaporation from the soil W.A. Payne, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, 6500 Amarillo surface; ET, crop transpiration ϩ E...