2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-9473(02)00104-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence diagnostics in generalized log-gamma regression models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
10

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
48
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous works on local influence curvatures in regression models for censored data are due to (Escobar & Meeker, 1992), (Ortega, Bolfarine & Paula, 2003), (Ortega, Cancho & Paula, 2009), (Ortega, Cordeiro & Hashimoto, 2011), (Silva, Ortega, Garibay & Barreto, 2008) and (Hashimoto, Ortega, Cancho, & Cordeiro, 2013). We consider model (7) and its log-likelihood function given by (8).…”
Section: Local Influencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous works on local influence curvatures in regression models for censored data are due to (Escobar & Meeker, 1992), (Ortega, Bolfarine & Paula, 2003), (Ortega, Cancho & Paula, 2009), (Ortega, Cordeiro & Hashimoto, 2011), (Silva, Ortega, Garibay & Barreto, 2008) and (Hashimoto, Ortega, Cancho, & Cordeiro, 2013). We consider model (7) and its log-likelihood function given by (8).…”
Section: Local Influencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The perturbation scheme used had been proposed by Ortega et al (2002), as presented in the equation (8) below (8) where, z max * is the new value maximum of the vector and z max is the maximum value of vector z;…”
Section: Simulation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in order to provide an indication of bad model fitting or influential observations, an influential analysis was made, see for example (Ortega et al 2003;Fachini et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%