2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.04.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of ablation technique on treatment failure for perivascular hepatocellular carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to a previous multicenter study [ 27 ], NT-RFA showed better LTP than standard monopolar RFA for HCCs located near large vessels, because more homogenous and extensive tissue necrosis and ablation zones were achieved beyond the macroscopic tumor boundary by placing the needles away from the tumor periphery. Second, blockage of drainage vessels from the target tumor may have been achieved in the early period of the ablation procedure, which may have blocked the dispersal of tumor cells into the drainage portal bloodstream, and may also be less susceptible to the heat sink effect [ 17 , 28 ]. Third, the centripetal thermal conduction from the periphery to the center of the index tumor may provide a theoretical advantage of less elevation of intratumoral pressure compared to conventional RFA [ 13 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a previous multicenter study [ 27 ], NT-RFA showed better LTP than standard monopolar RFA for HCCs located near large vessels, because more homogenous and extensive tissue necrosis and ablation zones were achieved beyond the macroscopic tumor boundary by placing the needles away from the tumor periphery. Second, blockage of drainage vessels from the target tumor may have been achieved in the early period of the ablation procedure, which may have blocked the dispersal of tumor cells into the drainage portal bloodstream, and may also be less susceptible to the heat sink effect [ 17 , 28 ]. Third, the centripetal thermal conduction from the periphery to the center of the index tumor may provide a theoretical advantage of less elevation of intratumoral pressure compared to conventional RFA [ 13 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The local tumour progression was 50.5% in monopolar RFA vs 16.3% in multi‐bipolar RFA 43 . Finally, a western monocentric study reported no difference in terms of local recurrence between liver resection and mbp‐RFA for the treatment of single perivascular HCC between 2 and 5 cm 41,44 . This data suggested that mbp‐RFA could be used to treat efficiently HCC closed to major vessels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%