2015
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Coherent Tunneling and Incoherent Hopping on the Charge Transfer Mechanism in Linear Donor–Bridge–Acceptor Systems

Abstract: The mechanism of charge transfer has been observed to change from tunneling to hopping with increasing numbers of DNA base pairs in polynucleotides and with the length of molecular wires. The aim of this paper is to investigate this transition by examining the population dynamics using a tight-binding Hamiltonian with model parameters to describe a linear donor-bridge-acceptor (D-B-A) system. The model includes a primary vibration and an electron-vibration coupling at each site. A further coupling of the prima… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
29
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the DNA we have studied is short in length (12 bp), the transport of charge will have also a contribution from tunneling. 50,51 However the main conclusions (critical stretching length) of the paper remain and do not change due to the inclusion of tunneling (see section X of the ESI †). The stretching length vs. current calculation described above was performed at 300 K. To understand the effect of temperature on the dynamics we also calculated the response for 5′end1-5′end2 pulling at 350 K and 250 K. The H-bond profiles are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Since the DNA we have studied is short in length (12 bp), the transport of charge will have also a contribution from tunneling. 50,51 However the main conclusions (critical stretching length) of the paper remain and do not change due to the inclusion of tunneling (see section X of the ESI †). The stretching length vs. current calculation described above was performed at 300 K. To understand the effect of temperature on the dynamics we also calculated the response for 5′end1-5′end2 pulling at 350 K and 250 K. The H-bond profiles are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…[6,29] This switchover of mechanism has been observed on other organic molecules such as donorbridge-acceptor systems or DNA, where electron tunnelling gives way to multi-step hopping as the distance the electron must travel increases. [117][118][119][120][121][122] In addition, spacing differences in interdigitated electrode arrays have been shown to change how quickly steady-state current is reached in electrochemical experiments. [123] Even electrode area has been reported to change current-voltage responses in G. sulfurreducens biofilms.…”
Section: The Importance Of Measurement Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Изучаются детали механизмов взаимодействия электронов с возмущениями цепочки нуклеотидов [23][24][25], рассчитываются вольт-амперные характеристики молекулы ДНК [26,27], анализируются способы управления характеристиками транспорта зарядов [28,29], исследуется влияние внешней среды [30], рассматриваются как перспективные сложные модификации, включающие ДНК [31][32][33][34][35][36], описываются различные прикладные возможности [37].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified