2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2009.00713.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of cutting regime and fertilizer application on the botanical composition, yield and nutritive value of herbage of wet grasslands in Central Europe

Abstract: The changes in dry matter (DM) yield, botanical composition and nutritive value of herbage to ruminants of two wet grasslands, Arrhenatherum elatius grassland (Experiment 1) and a Molinia caerulea fen meadow (Experiment 2), in which a range of cutting and fertilizer treatments were imposed in 1999, were assessed after 4-7 years of treatment imposition. Both experiments had a split-plot design with four replicates. In Experiment 1 the three main-plot cutting treatments were two cuts with a delayed first cut, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In respect of total species richness and number of short forbs, similar trend in S0-S2 was obvious, hence, this type of grassland with low availability of P responded to nutrient inputs without detrimental effect on species richness up to application of 120 kg N/ha/year (Čop et al 2009(Čop et al , Chytrý et al 2009). Contrary, Zechmeister et al (2003) reported meadows with > 90 kg N/ha/year differed in species richness significantly from those with lower levels of fertilizer application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In respect of total species richness and number of short forbs, similar trend in S0-S2 was obvious, hence, this type of grassland with low availability of P responded to nutrient inputs without detrimental effect on species richness up to application of 120 kg N/ha/year (Čop et al 2009(Čop et al , Chytrý et al 2009). Contrary, Zechmeister et al (2003) reported meadows with > 90 kg N/ha/year differed in species richness significantly from those with lower levels of fertilizer application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Decline of tall forbs was given by their low tolerance to frequent defoliation (Gaisler et al 2013) because, as strong competitors, they do not tolerate frequent disturbance (Pavlů et al 2011a). Decline of short forbs was given by an increase of tall grasses because of N addition , Kramberger and Kaligaric 2008, Čop et al 2009). Short forbs in S0 and short graminoids in S0, S1, and S2 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stable forage quality in Cynosurion and Violion contrasted with frequently reported declines in forage quality in the case of postponed defoliation in species-poor intensive grasslands (Bruinenberg et al 2002). Cynosurion and Violion could manifest such forage quality patterns due to their long grazing histories with early spring defoliation, which enabled the coexistence of slower developing species and also supported more digestible species occurring often in frequently defoliated sites (Louault et al 2005;Čop et al 2009). Differences in OMD between low altitude Bromion and upland Cynosurion could be partly because the lignification of cell wall material increases at high temperatures and accumulation of digestible storage products is greater at low temperatures (Gibson 2009).…”
Section: Forage Qualitymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…For these reasons, research of agronomic characteristics of semi-natural species-rich grasslands has received little attention, although such information is vital for the planning of grazing or cutting management in agri-environmental measures (Bokdam and Wallis De Vries 1992). Biomass production of particular vegetation units has been seldom investigated (Oomes and Mooi 1981;Schino et al 2003;Hrevušová et al 2009;Heinsoo et al 2010), and forage quality in semi-natural grasslands obtained from late harvesting has also received little attention (Bruinenberg et al 2003;Fiems et al 2004;Bovolenta et al 2008;Hessle et al 2008;Čop et al 2009). The studies that were conducted generally concluded that forage quality was low and only suitable for low-performing animals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Differences in soil nutrients were hardly reflected by nutrient concentrations and fibre contents in the aboveground biomass. However, productivity of the relatively nutrient-rich plateau sites was significantly enhanced so that a higher amount of nutrients was stored in a higher biomass quantity of the same quality (Smits et al 2008;Č op et al 2009a). As indicated by mean nutrient ratios, the studied grasslands seemed to be NP co-limited (Olde Venterink et al 2003;Güsewell 2004).…”
Section: Effects Of Abiotic Site Conditions and Seasonality On Biomasmentioning
confidence: 89%