2007
DOI: 10.1080/00103620601093827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Different Forms of Iron and Aluminum on the Nature of Soil Acidity of Some Inceptisols, Alfisols, and Ultisols

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Total soil Fe were comparable for Vineyards 1, 2, 3, and 4 but significantly higher for Vineyard 5 ( p < 0.05), but has higher concentrations of Fe due to formation of secondary Fe oxides. This agrees with previous studies that observed more abundant Fe oxides in vineyards in soils with Ultic B horizons, in which primary minerals are highly weathered and Al and Fe minerals dominate [ 23 , 30 ]. Total Mn was comparable across Vineyards 1, 2, 3, and 4 but was significantly lower for Vineyard 5 ( p < 0.05) ( Table 3 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Total soil Fe were comparable for Vineyards 1, 2, 3, and 4 but significantly higher for Vineyard 5 ( p < 0.05), but has higher concentrations of Fe due to formation of secondary Fe oxides. This agrees with previous studies that observed more abundant Fe oxides in vineyards in soils with Ultic B horizons, in which primary minerals are highly weathered and Al and Fe minerals dominate [ 23 , 30 ]. Total Mn was comparable across Vineyards 1, 2, 3, and 4 but was significantly lower for Vineyard 5 ( p < 0.05) ( Table 3 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%