1991
DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(91)90273-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of dose rate on local control of breast carcinoma treated by external beam irradiation plus iridium 192 implant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Biological effects of PB are, therefore, often compared to those after CLDR irradiation with equal overall treatment time. Because of decaying source activity, patients treated with a new LDR source are irradiated at higher dose rates than patients treated later with the same source, leading to a range in dose rates and, hence, exposure times (43,44). Analysis of our own patient data showed a dose rate ranging from 0.35 to 1.20 Gy/h (mean 0.80 Gy/h).…”
Section: The Overall Treatment Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biological effects of PB are, therefore, often compared to those after CLDR irradiation with equal overall treatment time. Because of decaying source activity, patients treated with a new LDR source are irradiated at higher dose rates than patients treated later with the same source, leading to a range in dose rates and, hence, exposure times (43,44). Analysis of our own patient data showed a dose rate ranging from 0.35 to 1.20 Gy/h (mean 0.80 Gy/h).…”
Section: The Overall Treatment Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…From 1971 to 1983, 398 biopsy-proven adenocarcinomas of the breast were definitively managed by radiotherapy. The breast and regional nodes received 45 Gy 60 Co in 25 fractions over 5 weeks (28,29). Electrons were used to deliver a further 15 Gy/7/1.5 weeks to the internal mammary chain and 25 Gy/11/2.5 weeks to the lower axilla.…”
Section: Low Dose Rate Brachytherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore the indication for the breast boost remains uncertain. In most centers the boost is performed routinely, mostly independent of clinical criteria [4,8,14,25,30,40,41,43]. Today the indication of a boost should depend on clinical and morphologic criteria.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increasing number of papers have dealt with the boost over the past decades [1,4,9,16,22,25,35,48]. An excellent overview is given by Fowble et al [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation