2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of experimental parameters on the composition of precipitates in metallic alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, up to now, there was a lack of benchmark against which APT sizes could indeed be measured or estimated. Comparisons with other techniques were reported for features of a size that is large enough to be measured by transmission electron microscopy [53] or secondary-ion mass spectrometry have been reported [54]. However, the match was often poor for smaller features like, for e.g., solute clusters, which remain physically ill-defined and for which there are no reference from real-space analytical techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, up to now, there was a lack of benchmark against which APT sizes could indeed be measured or estimated. Comparisons with other techniques were reported for features of a size that is large enough to be measured by transmission electron microscopy [53] or secondary-ion mass spectrometry have been reported [54]. However, the match was often poor for smaller features like, for e.g., solute clusters, which remain physically ill-defined and for which there are no reference from real-space analytical techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lateral Co concentration distribution through the filaments is challenging to determine accurately, due to experimental artifacts. There is a known artifact during APT field evaporation that arises from two linked sources: the change in dielectric constants in regions of high doping, and the evolution of a locally different radius of curvature due to differing evaporation fields, both causing lateral deviation of electric field lines from the surface-normals assumed during data reconstruction [10][11][12][13] . This causes areas of differing composition to be "magnified" in the reconstructed data.…”
Section: Structural Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%