2012
DOI: 10.4025/actascitechnol.v34i2.10353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of flow direction in the performance of anaerobic filters

Abstract: ABSTRACT. This work aimed to evaluate the performance of similar anaerobic filters operating with opposite wastewater flows, and compare mathematical models that describe the kinetics of organic matter degradation in both. Two pilot-scale filters were fed with domestic effluent -one filter worked as upflow (UAF) and the other as downflow (DAF). Experimental COD data obtained from samples taken along the length of the filters were used to fit the first-order mathematical model, the model proposed by Leduy and Z… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Anaerobic filters are considered useful systems, due to the high organic loading rates they tolerate for the treatment of low-and high-concentration effluents (Rajakumar et al, 2011). These filters are characterized by having a layer of support material (bed) inside, on which microorganisms are fixed, forming biofilms (Fia et al, 2012). The objective of this work was to evaluate the COD removal efficiency of an upflow anaerobic filter in continuous mode for the treatment of poultry effluents, using volcanic stone (tezontle) as a support medium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anaerobic filters are considered useful systems, due to the high organic loading rates they tolerate for the treatment of low-and high-concentration effluents (Rajakumar et al, 2011). These filters are characterized by having a layer of support material (bed) inside, on which microorganisms are fixed, forming biofilms (Fia et al, 2012). The objective of this work was to evaluate the COD removal efficiency of an upflow anaerobic filter in continuous mode for the treatment of poultry effluents, using volcanic stone (tezontle) as a support medium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os dados experimentais, obtidos com as determinações físico-químicas, foram apresentados em gráficos de dispersão com os pontos ligados por linhas suaves para facilitar a visualização. Os valores intermediários entre dois pontos consecutivos não representam interpolação de valores, pois não foram realizadas medições intermediárias nem efetuados ajustes nas curvas.A caracterização do biofilme formado em cada material suporte foi realizada por meio de microscopia eletrônica de varredura (MEV), sendo as principais morfologias celulares presentes avaliadas de acordo com metodologia reportada porFia et al (2012b).Nesta caracterização, as amostras foram fixadas com tampão de fosfato (pH 6,8), contendo 5% de glutaraldeído durante 1 hora e, em Valores médios e do desvio padrão dos parâmetros físico-químicos de caracterização do carvão ativado, da cerâmica de argila e da borracha de pneu.…”
unclassified
“…Horizontal anaerobic fixed bed reactors (HAFBR) have been studied for treatment of different effluents, among which stand out: wastewater from the processing of the fruit from the coffee tree (BORGES et al, 2009), and effluent with the presence of hydrocarbon -BTEX (RIBEIRO et al, 2012) and pentachlorophenol (DAMIANOVIC et al, 2009). This system has the advantage of being built on supported soil, which reduces the construction cost when compared to up flow filter which require a false bottom (suspended) with structure to support the weight of the liquid and support means generally crushed stone (FIA et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%