1993
DOI: 10.15554/pcij.05011993.52.66
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of High Strength Concrete on Transfer and Development Length of Pretensioning Strand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
50
0
13

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
50
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The Russell' model most greatly overestimated the transfer length of steel strands in UHPFRC, while the Martí-Vargas's model most greatly underestimated it. The models proposed by Mitchell et al (1993), Eurocode 2 (EN 2004), and Dang et al (2016b) quite reasonably predicted the transfer length of strands in UHPFRC with the average ratio (prediction/experiment) of 1.10 and 0.90, respectively. However, for a conservative design perspective, the Mitchell's model could be recommended to be most appropriate for predicting the transfer length of steel strands in UHPFRC.…”
Section: Transfer Lengthmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Russell' model most greatly overestimated the transfer length of steel strands in UHPFRC, while the Martí-Vargas's model most greatly underestimated it. The models proposed by Mitchell et al (1993), Eurocode 2 (EN 2004), and Dang et al (2016b) quite reasonably predicted the transfer length of strands in UHPFRC with the average ratio (prediction/experiment) of 1.10 and 0.90, respectively. However, for a conservative design perspective, the Mitchell's model could be recommended to be most appropriate for predicting the transfer length of steel strands in UHPFRC.…”
Section: Transfer Lengthmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…UHPFRC exhibited much shorter transfer lengths than HSC, and the ACI 318 and AASHTO LRFD codes significantly overestimated the transfer length of a strand embedded in UHPFRC. Based on a design perspective, the model proposed by Mitchell et al (1993) was considered to be most proper for predicting the transfer length of steel strands in UHPFRCC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Ghosh and Fintel, 1986;Mitchell et al, 1993;Roller et al, 1995), 단부균열에 대한 보강에 관한 연구 (Marshall, 1966;Marshall and Mattok, 1962;Nawy and Huang, 1977;Mirza and Tawfik, 1978) 그리고 프리텐션 부재의 피로와 내구성에 관한 연구 (Kaar et al, 1975;Boshore, 1965;Rabbat et al, 1979;Russell and Burns, 1994 3개 또는 7가닥 강선으로 된 프리텐션용 강연선은 위험단면을 지나 다음의 정착 길이 이상으로 부착되어야 한다.…”
Section: Fig 1 Concept Of Pretension Systemunclassified
“…The ACI transfer length equation was derived from and based on an average transfer bond stress of 2.76 MPa (Tabatabai and Dickson 1993). In addition, several authors (Zia and Mostafa 1977;Shahawy et al 1992;Mitchell et al 1993;Deatherage et al 1994;Buckner 1995;Tadros and Baishya 1996;Mahmoud et al 1999) consider that using term f si (the initial effective stress in a prestressing strand just after the prestress transfer, accounting for losses only by the elastic shortening of concrete) in Eq. (1) is more rational for design purposes than f se by considering that transfer length is established at the release of prestress and that it does not significantly change over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%