2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of interactions between NOM and particles on UF fouling mechanisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

10
56
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
10
56
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As filtration progressed, the cake layer became thicker and more compact, which led to a significant increase in total membrane fouling. However, no significant synergistic effect was observed during combined HA-kaolinite fouling in the present study, which differs from the findings of a study conducted by Jermann et al [8]. The reversible fouling that occurred during combined particle-NOM fouling was much higher than the reversible fouling observed in NOM or particle fouling, while the irreversible fouling was almost the same as that observed in the NOM fouling in the study conducted by Jermann et al These contradictory results may be due to the flat sheet membrane adopted in the experiment conducted by Jermann et al, which is susceptible to the concentration of particles.…”
Section: Effect Of Coagulation On Nom Fouling During Ufcontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As filtration progressed, the cake layer became thicker and more compact, which led to a significant increase in total membrane fouling. However, no significant synergistic effect was observed during combined HA-kaolinite fouling in the present study, which differs from the findings of a study conducted by Jermann et al [8]. The reversible fouling that occurred during combined particle-NOM fouling was much higher than the reversible fouling observed in NOM or particle fouling, while the irreversible fouling was almost the same as that observed in the NOM fouling in the study conducted by Jermann et al These contradictory results may be due to the flat sheet membrane adopted in the experiment conducted by Jermann et al, which is susceptible to the concentration of particles.…”
Section: Effect Of Coagulation On Nom Fouling During Ufcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Reversible fouling is represented by the part of the specific flux restored by physical backwashing, which is equivalent to the difference in J SF /J SF0 before and after backwashing. The irreversible fouling is accumulated fouling that cannot be restored by backwashing, which equals the difference in J SF /J SF0 between the beginning of the treatment cycle and the beginning of the next cycle [8]. The average total membrane fouling, irreversible fouling and irreversible fouling represented by J SF /J SF0 is presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Effect Of Coagulation On Nom Fouling During Ufmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In earlier works (Belleville et al 1990(Belleville et al , 1992, performing microfi ltration of red wine, membrane fouling has been attributed to high levels of polysaccharides and polyphenols. In ultrafi ltration processes the interaction between inorganic particles and biopolymers has resulted in a fouling cake of signifi cantly reduced porosity (Jermann et al 2008). An irreversible fouling by organic matter takes place due to internal pore adsorption, affecting negatively the ultrafi ltration process (Katsoufi dou et al 2005).…”
Section: Membrane Separation Process Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%