2019
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0001352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Multidirectional Cable Restrainer on Seismic Fragility of a Curved Bridge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has found that unseating prevention devices with a smaller initial clearance and a more substantial cable length (with a lower cable stiffness) were more efficacious [23,26]. Therefore, according to the actual conditions of the bridge, an unseating prevention device with an initial clearance of 8 cm (slightly less than the allowable deformation of the bearing, which is 8.12 cm), and a length of 2 m was selected as the ultimate seismic control measure to coordinate with the limit device.…”
Section: Selection and Simulation Of Unseating Prevention Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It has found that unseating prevention devices with a smaller initial clearance and a more substantial cable length (with a lower cable stiffness) were more efficacious [23,26]. Therefore, according to the actual conditions of the bridge, an unseating prevention device with an initial clearance of 8 cm (slightly less than the allowable deformation of the bearing, which is 8.12 cm), and a length of 2 m was selected as the ultimate seismic control measure to coordinate with the limit device.…”
Section: Selection and Simulation Of Unseating Prevention Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the relationship between the seismic responses of the bridge and the seismic intensity, as well as the seismic method of pounding damage, the intensity of earthquakes used in this paper increases stepwise; earthquakes with an exceeding probability of 63.2%, 10%, and 2% in 100 years (small, moderate, and large earthquakes) and the Northridge earthquake in the United States are considered [26]. Figure 5 show the time histories of the small, moderate, large, and the Northridge earthquakes.…”
Section: Earthquakesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, considering the high flexibility of isolation bearings, the isolated bridges may experience a large displacement under strong earthquakes, and consequently, they are susceptible to unseating problems (Ozbulut and Hurlebaus, 2011). In this regard, supplemental restraining devices in combination with isolation devices can be provided in order to efficiently protect such structures (Guo et al, 2019; Wang et al, 2019b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%