1993
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9673(93)83112-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of polymer morphology on the ability of imprinted network polymers to resolve enantiomers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
292
2
7

Year Published

1996
1996
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 403 publications
(323 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
22
292
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…As reported by Sellergren and Shea, 23 the pore diameter seems to be relatively large (about 1500 Å) even under dry conditions. However, the contribution of intraparticle convective flow to mass transfer is probably negligible because of the low flow velocity of the mobile phase.…”
Section: Chromatographic Conditionssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…As reported by Sellergren and Shea, 23 the pore diameter seems to be relatively large (about 1500 Å) even under dry conditions. However, the contribution of intraparticle convective flow to mass transfer is probably negligible because of the low flow velocity of the mobile phase.…”
Section: Chromatographic Conditionssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…It has been reported that a porogenic solvent can affect the structure and morphology of a MIP, and the retention of an analyte on the MIP. 15 As expected, there are large differences in the retention, selectivity and enantioseparation factors of nilvadipine among MIPs 4 -7. Figure 5 shows the effect of a toluene concentration used as a mobile phase on the retention, selectivity and enantioseparation factors of nilvadipine on MIPs 4 -7, which are prepared using toluene, chloroform, cyclohexanol and phenylacetonitrile, respectively, as the porogens.…”
Section: Effect Of Porogensupporting
confidence: 58%
“…ionic, hydrophobic and hydrogen bonding. The non-covalent imprinting approach seems to hold more potential for the future of molecular imprinting due to the vast number of compounds, including biological compounds, which are capable of non-covalent interactions with functional monomers [29][30]. Limits to the non-covalent molecular imprinting are set by the peculiar molecular recognition conditions.…”
Section: Non-covalent Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%