1980
DOI: 10.1038/clpt.1980.213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of prolonged recumbency on drug disposition

Abstract: The disposition of lidocaine and penicillin was studied in normal subjects before and after 7 days of total recumbency. Penicillin (1,000,000 U) and lidocaine (100 mg) were administered intravenously. Lidocaine protein binding was also followed. Total body clearance, elimination half-life, and volume of distribution were calculated. There were no statistically significant differences in these disposition parameters before and after 7 days of recumbency. The binding of lidocaine also was not changed after bed r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that disease and age influence the absorption and disposition of drugs (Sabath, 1970;Palatsi & Kaipainen, 1971;Bolme & Eriksson, 1975;Kunst & Mattie, 1975;George, 1976;Klotz, 1976;Nimmo, 1976;Kates et al, 1980;Welling & Tse, 1982;Yashuara et al, 1982), and these effects probably explain the wide range of the values we obtained in patients as well as the differences between our findings and those of other authors. The relatively high AUCPO we found for both drugs might be partly explained by the differences in the degree of renal dysfunction among our patients, since we found a strong correlation between the plasma clearance and the creatinine clearance of both drugs.…”
Section: Clinical Pharmacokinetic Studycontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…It is well known that disease and age influence the absorption and disposition of drugs (Sabath, 1970;Palatsi & Kaipainen, 1971;Bolme & Eriksson, 1975;Kunst & Mattie, 1975;George, 1976;Klotz, 1976;Nimmo, 1976;Kates et al, 1980;Welling & Tse, 1982;Yashuara et al, 1982), and these effects probably explain the wide range of the values we obtained in patients as well as the differences between our findings and those of other authors. The relatively high AUCPO we found for both drugs might be partly explained by the differences in the degree of renal dysfunction among our patients, since we found a strong correlation between the plasma clearance and the creatinine clearance of both drugs.…”
Section: Clinical Pharmacokinetic Studycontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Several studies failed to show any relevant postural effect on metabolism or elimination of the drugs administered intravenously [44][45][46][47]. As there is no absorption phase after intravenous application, the effects of posture on gastric emptying are not relevant.…”
Section: Posture and Route Of Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Penicillin (10 6 U) or lidocaine (100 mg) was given intravenously before and after 7 days of 0°recumbency. Moreover, during a 4-day head-down tilt [90], we observed variations in the total clearance of lidocaine, obtaining differing results from those of Kates et al [87]. Penicillin was measured by a microbiologic method and lidocaine concentrations were determined by gas chromatography.…”
Section: Human Modelsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…No data No variation of the clearance after 7 days in supine position [87] Increase in the clearance after 1 and 4 days of )6°bedrest [90] No data Penicillin i.v.…”
Section: Liver Metabolism (Phase I Metabolism)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation