Influence of risk propensity, behavioural biases and demographic factors on equity investors' risk perception

Abstract

PurposeInvestor risk perception is a personalized judgement on the uncertainty of returns pertaining to a financial instrument. This study identifies key psychological and demographic factors that influence risk perception. It also unravels the complex relationship between demographic attributes and investor's risk attitude towards equity investment.Design/methodology/approachExploratory factor analysis is used to identify factors that define investor risk perception. Multiple regression is used to assess the relationship between demographic traits and factor groups. Kruskal–Wallis test is used to ascertain whether the factors extracted differ across demographic categories. A risk perception framework based on these findings is developed to provide deeper insight.FindingsThere is evidence of the relationship and influence of demographic factors on risk propensity and behavioural bias. From this study, it is apparent that return expectation, time horizon and loss aversion, which define the risk propensity construct, vary significantly based on demographic traits. Familiarity, overconfidence, anchoring and experiential biases which define the behavioural bias construct differ across demographic categories. These factors influence the risk perception of an individual with respect to equity investments.Research limitations/implicationsThe reference for the framework of this study is limited as there has been no precedence of similar work in academia.Practical implicationsThis paper establishes that information seekers make rational decisions. The paper iterates the need for portfolio managers to develop and align investment strategies after evaluation of investors' risk by including these behavioural factors, this can particularly be advantageous during extreme volatility in markets that concedes the possibility of irrational decision making.Social implicationsThis study highlights that regulators need to acknowledge the investor's affective, cognitive and demographic impact on equity markets and align risk control measures that are conducive to market evolution. It also creates awareness among market participants that psychological factors and behavioural biases can have an impact on investment decisions.Originality/valueThis is the only study that looks at a three-dimensional perspective of the investor risk perception framework. The study presents the relationship between risk propensity, behavioural bias and demographic factors in the backdrop of “information” being the mediating variable. This paper covers five characteristics of risk propensity and eight behavioural biases, such a vast coverage has not been attempted within the academic realm earlier with the aforesaid perspective.

Is the market biased in M&A, dividend payment, and share repurchase events?

“…Studies that support the dividend signaling theory suggest that the market usually responds positively to the higher dividend events and negatively to the lower dividend events. For example [ 45 ], argues that dividend increase announcement leads to an increase in stock returns of stock-traded companies, whereas the dividend reduction is associated with a decrease in stock returns [ 46 ]. 's research also demonstrates that raising a company's dividend results in a favorable market response; conversely, cutting a dividend had little impact on the market [ 12 ].…”

A Proposed Conceptual Framework on The Determinants of Psychological Biases towards Retail Investor’s Decision Making: Experience as Mediating Role

“…Furthermore, if the retail investor is knowledgeable about many elements of his or her investment behaviour as well as the reason for the perceived risks, risk perception may be adjusted (Deb & Singh, 2018;Singh & Bhowal, 2008). With a better knowledge of behavioural finance, industry practitioners can better comprehend investor preferences and provide investing strategies and products that match the investor's risk tolerance (Saivasan & Lokhande, 2022). On the other hand, risk is a component that every investor sees or reacts to.…”

Does cognitive biased knowledge influence investor decisions? An empirical investigation using machine learning and artificial neural network

“…According to researchers, prospect theory (Kahneman and Tversky, 1979a) explains that choosing the best and rational decision from various risky and uncertainty situations always depends upon human behaviour rather than maximum utility value due to the imbalance between gains and losses (De Souza et al, 2020;Sharma et al, 2019). When it comes to equity investments, Saivasan et al (2022) found that an individual's investment choice is influenced by the time frame, expectation of returns, and loss aversion that define the risk. There is a link between risk and demographic factors, which may also impact on behaviour.…”