1972
DOI: 10.2527/jas1972.343465x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Tannins on the Nutritive Value of Soybean Meal for Ruminants1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ANOVA results suggested that the contents of phytic acid of glyphosate-tolerant soybeans and Chinese conventional soybeans had no significant difference (p > 0.05) in range of 1.02 to 1.20 g/ 100 g. Tannin was also considered as an antinutrient for its complex formation with proteins, carbohydrates and enzyme etc. and thus affected the adsorption of these nutrients for human health (Driedger & Hatfield, 1972). The tannin content of glyphosate-tolerant soybeans was 1.95 g/100 g for G1 and 1.76 g/100 g for G2, which decreased at 32-51% compared to Chinese conventional soybeans.…”
Section: Comparison Of Typical Components Of Soybean Varietiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…ANOVA results suggested that the contents of phytic acid of glyphosate-tolerant soybeans and Chinese conventional soybeans had no significant difference (p > 0.05) in range of 1.02 to 1.20 g/ 100 g. Tannin was also considered as an antinutrient for its complex formation with proteins, carbohydrates and enzyme etc. and thus affected the adsorption of these nutrients for human health (Driedger & Hatfield, 1972). The tannin content of glyphosate-tolerant soybeans was 1.95 g/100 g for G1 and 1.76 g/100 g for G2, which decreased at 32-51% compared to Chinese conventional soybeans.…”
Section: Comparison Of Typical Components Of Soybean Varietiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…2) resulted in reduced proteolysis in the rumen and improved daily weight gains, feed efficiencies and N balances in lambs. 81 Low doses of chestnut tannins significantly reduced ammonia in an in vitro Rusitec fermentation system; 50 they also enhanced (by 5%) non-ammonia N flow to the duodenum in growing bulls (Bos taurus L.) and resulted in higher apparent intestinal protein digestion. 82 However, 21 g chestnut tannins kg −1 added to soybean meal produced no significant effect on voluntary intake, feed conversion, daily gain or length of fattening period when lambs were finished from 15 to 25 kg.…”
Section: Effects Of Added Tannins or Tannin-rich Supplementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of hydrolysable tannins to reduce rumen protein degradability is less 210 C. Poncet, D. Rémond [10], beyond this level, the effect of tannin addition was less effective. Furthermore, above the dose of 100 g of tannins per kg of SBM, intestinal digestion was decreased.…”
Section: Effects Of Tanninsmentioning
confidence: 99%