2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2020.110874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of temperature and pressure on the electrical resistivity of gold and copper up to 1350 K and 100 GPa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed a sharp reduction in the magnitude of resistivity versus pressure slope at ∼4 GPa in both Cu and Au ( Figure 6 ). In comparison with experimental studies measured up to 5 GPa [ 11 , 13 ] and theoretical study [ 26 ], our results were slightly lower in values by about 1 µohm-cm The deviation with these experimental studies could be attributed to error in the determination of sample geometry from the ex-situ recovered samples as well as pressure calibration. However, the slope of the pressure dependence measured up to ∼4 GPa in our present study was comparable with previous studies.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…We observed a sharp reduction in the magnitude of resistivity versus pressure slope at ∼4 GPa in both Cu and Au ( Figure 6 ). In comparison with experimental studies measured up to 5 GPa [ 11 , 13 ] and theoretical study [ 26 ], our results were slightly lower in values by about 1 µohm-cm The deviation with these experimental studies could be attributed to error in the determination of sample geometry from the ex-situ recovered samples as well as pressure calibration. However, the slope of the pressure dependence measured up to ∼4 GPa in our present study was comparable with previous studies.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Indeed, Tan and Tam [36] have used the Lennard-Jones pairwise potential [96] to formulate the SMM EOS. This method often causes an overestimation of the scaled atomic volume [97][98][99]. At 330 GPa, ξ 3 for the Lennard-Jones iron has been reported to be 0.72 [36], about 22 % larger than the DAC value [51][52][53].…”
Section: Fig 2 (Color Online)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in recent years, many simulations and theoretical studies on the influences of factors such as temperature, pressure, atomic number, impurities,... on structural, mechanical; thermodynamic, melting and electrical properties, phase transtions of metals, alloys and polymers have been published [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%