2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2015.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of vertical internals on a bubbling fluidized bed characterized by X-ray tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the workstation it was possible to trigger the X-ray source and read out the signals from the detector plate. Further details on the setup and the measurement technique can be found in [15,16,18]. Each result reported in the present study is an average of 2100 frames (at 35 Hz) of one minute of continuous recording from one source and one detector plate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Using the workstation it was possible to trigger the X-ray source and read out the signals from the detector plate. Further details on the setup and the measurement technique can be found in [15,16,18]. Each result reported in the present study is an average of 2100 frames (at 35 Hz) of one minute of continuous recording from one source and one detector plate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To convert the measured attenuation (intensity) to a solids concentration (path length), a calibration protocol that has already been reported in [16] was performed. A dummy calibration module made of identical material (Perspex ® ) and with identical inner diameter (100 mm) and wall thickness (5 mm) as the fluidized bed reactor was constructed (Fig.…”
Section: Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The holdup may increase or decrease depending on the configuration and disposition of the internal tubed. Maurer et al (2015) studied the influence of inner tubes (with outer diameter ranging from 0.01 to 0.02 m) in a 0.14 m column by using x ray tomography. The authors reported a reduction in bubble size for the case with vertical internals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various measurement devices can be used to measure gas holdup in bubble/slurry bubble columns, such as fiber optical probes, conductivity probes, differential pressure probes, ultrasonic techniques, electrical capacitance tomography, X‐ray tomography, gamma‐ray densitometry, and gamma‐ray computed tomography (CT) . However, gamma‐ray computed tomography is superior to other techniques due to its capability to visualize and measure gas holdup over the entire cross‐sectional area of the column in dense and opaque flows that are not visible to other measurement devices due to their limitation to measure in single points (such as probe‐based measurement) or their low penetration capability to pass through the high attenuating material (such as X‐ray tomography) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%