2018
DOI: 10.24136/eq.2018.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information infrastructure as a pillar of the knowledge-based economy ? an analysis of regional differentiation in Poland

Abstract: Research background: Information infrastructure is a very important pillar within a knowledge-based economy. The widespread use of information and communication technologies facilitates effective communication, dissemination and processing of information and knowledge. It also creates new opportunities for the effective use of knowledge and information in building competitive advantage. Information infrastructure is also a significant determinant in the development of  territorial units, and therefore it affec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The conducted econometric research for the years 1995-2016 confirms the positive process of Polish economy modernisation and its structural adjustment to the requirements of highly competitive knowledge-based economy (see Balcerzak, 2015;Gajdos, 2016;Wierzbicka, 2018). Within this contexts one should point to positive tendencies with respect to the growth of employment for professionals or technicians, and decrease for clerks (office workers) and farm and related workers.…”
Section: Discussion and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The conducted econometric research for the years 1995-2016 confirms the positive process of Polish economy modernisation and its structural adjustment to the requirements of highly competitive knowledge-based economy (see Balcerzak, 2015;Gajdos, 2016;Wierzbicka, 2018). Within this contexts one should point to positive tendencies with respect to the growth of employment for professionals or technicians, and decrease for clerks (office workers) and farm and related workers.…”
Section: Discussion and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…A range of multicriteria methods such as SAW (Simple Additive Weighting), AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process), TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution), PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation), COP-RAS (Complex proportional assessment), ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) and others are widely used in scientific research (Balcerzak, 2017;Balcerzak & Pietrzak, 2017a, 2017bWang et al, 2009;Stankevičienė & Mencaitė, 2012;Zavadskas et al, 2010;Nugaras & Ginevičius, 2015;Tvaronavičienė et al, 2008;Tvaronavičienė & Grybaitė, 2012;Guerrero-Baena et al, 2015;Latinopoulos & Kechagia, 2015;Podvezko, 2009;Wierzbicka, 2018;Pietrzak & Ziemkiewicz, 2018a, 2018b.…”
Section: Multicriteria Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the final step, the selected diagnostic variables should be normalised, and the negative variables should be transferred into benefit variables. As common practice in this process, the unitarisation method or standardization are applied [34,35,36]. As all the final diagnostic variables applied in the research were classified as benefit variables, a classic standardization procedure given with Formula 2 was used here.…”
Section: Data Preparation and Formal Criteria For Variables Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%