Information Technology in PBRNs: The Indiana University Medical Group Research Network (IUMG ResNet) Experience

Abstract

Objective: Research in practice-based research networks (PBRNs) is hampered by difficulty managing, identifying, and enrolling potential subjects. Well-designed informatics applications can greatly improve these processes.Methods: We considered a literature review, discussion with PBRN researchers, and personal experience to outline important principles to apply when considering electronic data collection in a PBRN. We provide specific working examples of electronic means we use to improve data collection and patient enrollment.Results: Our PBRN has screened more than 18,000 patients and enrolled more than 6000 study subjects in 5 years. Less than 2% of potentially eligible patients are missed by our research assistants. We achieved this high rate of success through extensive integration of the ResNet infrastructure (research databases and personnel) with an electronic medical record (EMR) system and computerized provider order entry. We make extensive use of widely used standards for data storage, definition, and transmission to ensure data reusability. We successfully implemented a real-time means to identify follow-up patients.Conclusion: Electronic data collection can greatly facilitate PBRN research, particularly by improving data management and identification of eligible patients. Key principles to ensure successful implementation include use of data standards and centralized electronic data management. (J Am Board Fam

Barriers, Enablers, and Incentives for Research Participation: A Report from the Ambulatory Care Research Network (ACRN)

“…This has been successful in several PBRNs. [22, 23] and a number of institutions have made this a strategy in their CTSA activities.…”

Revisiting Practice-Based Research Networks as a Platform for Mental Health Services Research

“…At times, busy practitioners with no or little research training are asked to report data collected from their clients, introducing additional validity concerns (Zarin et al 1997). PBRNs may ask clinicians to institute specific measurement systems into their practice, but should recognize that the literature is full of warnings that these systems need to be clinician friendly, clinically relevant, and compatible with practice preferences to get clinicians to adhere to their use and yield valid data (Clothier 2005; Genel and Dobs 2003; Kho et al 2007; LeBailey et al 2003; Lindbloom et al 2004; Van Weel et al 2000). Efforts to mitigate potential measurement validity problems include (1) piloting measurement protocols to work through problems before the larger study is launched, and (2) conducting small validity pilots to assess whether self-report measures correlates with client report or case record data.…”

Employing Computers for the Recruitment into Clinical Trials: A Comprehensive Systematic Review

“…Keyword searches were often employed when no structured data elements were available [29,41,73,93,101,106,110]. They could easily be added to complement queries of structured patient data [3,66,98,124]. Pakhomov [93] compared a keyword search with 2 other NLP methods: naive Bayes and perceptron.…”