Informing the decision makers on the cost and value of green building

Bartlett, Ed; Howard, Nigel

doi:10.1080/096132100418474

Cited by 154 publications

(88 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Ugotovili so, da so bili skupni stroški gradnje bolj ekoloških stavb v povprečju le za slaba 2 % višji, kar je občutno manj, kot so običajno pokazale druge raziskave. Zanemarljivo višji stroški so lahko posledica dejstva, da za gradnjo okolju prijaznejše stavbe potrebujemo manj gradbene mehanizacije in opreme (Bartlett in Howard, 2000). Za gradnjo zelene stavbe torej potrebujemo manj virov, kar pomeni, da stroški zelene gradnje ne bi smeli biti višji.…”

Section: Uvodunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Economising subsidies for green housing features: A stated preference approach

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Racionalizacija subvencij za lastnosti zelenih stanovanj: pristop izraženih preferencZaradi ogromne količine porabljene energije in virov v stanovanjski gradnji so vlade mnogih držav prepoznale potrebo po nujnem spodbujanju zelenih oziroma okolju prijaznih stanovanj, da bi omogočile trajnostni razvoj tega področja. Poleg uvajanja ustreznih predpisov lahko vlade spodbudijo investitorje, da v gradnjo vključijo zelene elemente, tako da jim ponudijo različne oblike subvencij. Dodelitev tovrstnih subvencij pa pogosto ni ekonomična. Teoretično gledano lahko tržne sile vodijo k zagotavljanju zelenih stanovanj brez vladnega poseganja, če so akterji na trgu za zelene elemente stanovanj pripravljeni plačati več. V tem okviru so v članku predstavljeni izsledki raziskave, v kateri so avtorji na podlagi strukturirane ankete, izvedene v Macau, primerjali potencialno pripravljenost kupcev stanovanj, da plačajo za različne lastnosti zelenih stanovanj. Preučevane stanovanjske lastnosti so obsegale rabo zelenih materialov (na primer trajnostni gozdni proizvodi) in načinov gradnje (na primer montažna gradnja), energijsko učinkovite tehnologije (na primer LED-razsvetljava) in naprave za varčevanje z vodo (na primer sistem za prečiščevanje odpadne sanitarne vode). Ugotovitve kažejo, da so na pripravljenost anketirancev v glavnem vplivale finančne spodbude. Lastnosti zelenih stanovanj, ki lahko prinašajo neposredno finančno korist, so se ujemale z večjo pripravljenostjo za plačilo (PZP). Na koncu članka so predstavljeni mogoči vplivi raziskovalnih izsledkov na politiko obravnavanega področja.

show abstract

Section: Uvodunclassified

“…Kljub temu je vse več primerov, ki dokazujejo koristi vključevanja ekoloških ali trajnostnih elementov v gradbene načrte. Kar zadeva stanovalce, jim zelene stavbe zagotavljajo bolj zdravo bivalno okolje in tako ohranjajo ali celo povečajo njihovo storilnost (Bartlett in Howard, 2000;Kats idr., 2003;Robinson, 2005). Kats idr.…”

Section: Koristi Zelene Gradnjeunclassified

Economising subsidies for green housing features: A stated preference approach

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…One of the foremost barriers to the adoption of green buildings is the perception that they are disproportionate with regards to initial capital expenditure (CB Richard Ellis, 2009). However, international cost-value studies contesting this view have been undertaken by Bartlett and Howard (2000), Frej (2003), Zhou and Lowe (2003), Pivo and McNamara (2005), Reed and Wilkinson (2005) and, Matthiessen and Morris (2007), who have provided substantial research indicating that there is in fact no substantial variance in average costs of initial construction costs of green buildings when compared with conventional buildings. Nicolay (2007) debates that although there may be additional costs associated with green buildings, these may be recovered through operational savings, reduced maintenance costs and reduced energy costs resulting from the incorporation GBFIs within the building's design.…”

Section: Drivers and Barriers To The Adoption Of Green Buildingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Incorporating GBFIs into Commercial Property Valuation

Nurick¹,

Jeune²,

Dawber³

et al. 2013

Proceedings of the 20th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference - Vienna, Austria

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The widespread international acceptance of green buildings has led to rapid awareness of green building features and initiatives (GBFIs) in the South African property and construction industry, however among valuers it seems the awareness is still in its infancy. It is essential to be able to establish the effects of these GBFIs on the market value of commercial property. Purpose of this Paper -To investigate to what level South African valuers engage with GBFIs, when a commercial valuation is conducted. Methodology -Three research methods were implemented in order to gather data; semistructured interviews were conducted with valuers of varying degrees of experience in Cape Town, on-line surveys were completed by a sample of South African valuers, and a valuation simulation was conducted to determine the quantitative impact of GBFIs. Findings -The findings present evidence that even though South African valuers have limited knowledge of green buildings, they recognise the importance of incorporating the GBFIs in the valuation process. Energy efficiency was highlighted as the most important GBFI to take into account in South Africa, due to the volatility associated with increasing energy costs. The inclusion of GBFIs in valuations in practice was seen to be hindered by the lack of sufficient transactional data in the market. Furthermore, valuers experienced difficulty in quantifying and justifying the impact of GBFIs on the value of commercial green property. Value of the paper -This paper serves to highlight the current challenges faced by South African valuers with regards to incorporating GBFIs in their valuations. This paper also shows how accounting for GBFIs could potentially increase the value of a commercial building.

show abstract

“…Green Building has been criticized for its focus on "bells and whistles", costs, and lack of locational sensitivity [34][35][36][37][38]. Similarly, detractors of Smart Growth have argued that policies and regulations that enforce higher densities may result in greater congestion and reduced affordability in housing [39][40][41].…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sustainable Urban Development? Exploring the Locational Attributes of LEED-ND Projects in the United States through a GIS Analysis of Light Intensity and Land Use

Smith

Bereitschaft

2016

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

LEED ® -ND™ is the latest attempt to develop more sustainable urban environs in the United States. The LEED ® -ND™ program was created to provide a green rating system that would improve the quality of life for all people through the inclusion of sustainable development practices. To achieve this, a premium is placed on the locational attributes of proposed projects under the "Smart Location and Linkages" credit category. The purpose of this paper is to explore the locational attributes of LEED ® -ND™ projects in the United States to determine if projects are being located in areas that will result in achieving the program's stated objectives. Specifically, this paper will examine two locational variables (i.e., night-time light intensity and land use cover) through the use of GIS to determine the effectiveness of these criteria.

show abstract

Informing the decision makers on the cost and value of green building

Cited by 154 publications

References 0 publications

Economising subsidies for green housing features: A stated preference approach

Economising subsidies for green housing features: A stated preference approach

Incorporating GBFIs into Commercial Property Valuation

Sustainable Urban Development? Exploring the Locational Attributes of LEED-ND Projects in the United States through a GIS Analysis of Light Intensity and Land Use

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About